2007
DOI: 10.1086/525640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Many-Worlds Interpretation and Quantum Computation

Abstract: David Deutsch and others have suggested that the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics is the only interpretation capable of explaining the special efficiency quantum computers seem to enjoy over classical ones. I argue that this view is not tenable. Using a toy algorithm I show that the Many-Worlds Interpretation must crucially use the ontological status of the universal state vector to explain quantum computational efficiency, as opposed to the particular ontology of the MWI, that is, the computati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no reason to think that the only interpretation of quantum mechanics that can support the QPT is the MWI. Duwell (2007) argues that any interpretation that interprets pure quantum states ontologically will be able to endorse the thesis as much as any other.…”
Section: The Quantum Parallelism Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no reason to think that the only interpretation of quantum mechanics that can support the QPT is the MWI. Duwell (2007) argues that any interpretation that interprets pure quantum states ontologically will be able to endorse the thesis as much as any other.…”
Section: The Quantum Parallelism Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Quantum Parallelism Thesis, a QPRAM enjoys an advantage over a classical PRAM because it can invoke "quantum parallelism". This refers to a capacity to carry out many computations simultaneously in superposition of quantum states (see, for [12,13,14,15,16,17]). Due to the lack of a full understanding of what quantum parallelism exactly means (and why a QPRAM is superior to a classical PRAM [18]), one can assume this:…”
Section: Conjecture Of Quantum Parallel Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is what I take to be the aim of explanations of quantum speedup that appeal, for instance, to the fact that quantum computers are capable of massively parallel function evaluation using a single circuit (Duwell, 2004(Duwell, , 2007Hewitt-Horsman, 2009), or accounts of quantum speedup that explain it as arising from the manipulation of the correlations between these function evaluations instead of the results of the evaluations themselves (Steane, 2003), or those which describe quantum computers as computing the global properties of functions (Bub, 2006(Bub, , 2010.…”
Section: The Question Regarding the Source Of Quantum Speedupmentioning
confidence: 99%