The Many Faces of Closure and Introspection

Allo, Patrick

doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9214-2

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…30 This argument is only meant as a reformulation of the revisionary arguments we previously considered. Within the context of logics of knowledge and belief, the use of fragmented models, which gives up the requirement that an agent's information should correspond to a single set of indistinguishable states, is a third option (Stalnaker, 1984;Allo, 2013b). 31 And some solutions to this problem even combine logical revision with the possibility of truly counter-logical states in S (e.g., Priest, 2005, ch.…”

Section: Putting the Model To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logic, Reasoning and Revision

Allo

2015

Theoria

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The traditional connection between logic and reasoning has been under pressure ever since Gilbert Harman attacked the received view that logic yields norms for what we should believe. In this article I first place Harman's challenge in the broader context of the dialectic between logical revisionists like Bob Meyer and sceptics about the role of logic in reasoning like Harman. I then develop a formal model based on contemporary epistemic and doxastic logic in which the relation between logic and norms for belief can be captured.

show abstract

Section: Putting the Model To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logic, Reasoning and Revision

Allo

2015

Theoria

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Elsewhere (Allo, 2013), the first author proposed the following interpretation of each type of group knowledge: (a) distributed knowledge is implicitly available knowledge; (b) particular knowledge is explicitly available knowledge; (c) general knowledge is readily available (explicit) knowledge; and (d) common knowledge is transparently available (explicit) knowledge. For instance, ϕ being distributed knowledge within G is compatible with every member being ignorant about ϕ.…”

Section: Formalising Shared Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%