2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-546x(00)00115-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mann process for perturbed m-accretive operators in Banach spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using Michael's selection theorem [16] and Nadler's theorem [18] some existence theorems and some iterative algorithms for solving this kind of set-valued variational inclusions in Banach spaces are established and suggested. The results presented in this paper generalize, improve, and unify the corresponding results of Noor [19][20][21][22][23][24], Ding [8], Huang [10], Kazmi [12], Jung and Morales [11], Liu [14], Hassouni and Mouafi [9], Zeng [28], and Chang [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using Michael's selection theorem [16] and Nadler's theorem [18] some existence theorems and some iterative algorithms for solving this kind of set-valued variational inclusions in Banach spaces are established and suggested. The results presented in this paper generalize, improve, and unify the corresponding results of Noor [19][20][21][22][23][24], Ding [8], Huang [10], Kazmi [12], Jung and Morales [11], Liu [14], Hassouni and Mouafi [9], Zeng [28], and Chang [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(ii) Theorems 4.1-4.4 generalize, improve, and unify the corresponding recent results of Noor [19][20][21][22][23][24], Liu [14], Ding [8], Huang [10], Kazmi [12], Chang [2][3][4][5], Jung and Morales [11], Hassouni and Moudafi [9], and Zeng [28].…”
Section: Converge Strongly To the Solutions Q W K Respectively Of Tsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Then J is said to be weakly sequentially continuous if for each {x n } ∈ E with x n x, J (x n ) * J (x). We need the following lemma for the proof of our main results, which was given in Jung and Morales [11]. It is actually Lemma 1 of Petryshyn [15] (also see Asplund [1]).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lemma 2.1 was also given in Jung and Morales [9] and Lemma 2.2 is essentially Lemma 2 of Liu [13] (also see [21])).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 89%