2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.069
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: The Interventional Radiology Viewpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percutaneous ablation destructs the target tumor with a safety margin of normal parenchyma sparing the uninvolved hepatic tissue. This is in opposition to SBRT application that affects a greater amount of normal liver parenchyma via the surrounding radiation portals with resultant liver toxicity [65]. Repeat treatment with SBRT is thus more likely to lead to liver toxicity or even failure.…”
Section: Comparing Percutaneous Ablation To Other Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous ablation destructs the target tumor with a safety margin of normal parenchyma sparing the uninvolved hepatic tissue. This is in opposition to SBRT application that affects a greater amount of normal liver parenchyma via the surrounding radiation portals with resultant liver toxicity [65]. Repeat treatment with SBRT is thus more likely to lead to liver toxicity or even failure.…”
Section: Comparing Percutaneous Ablation To Other Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important difference between RFA and SBRT is repeatability. In contrast to RFA, repeated use of SBRT is limited for new HCC lesions due to the decreased liver function after SBRT [31]. Considering that frequent intrahepatic recurrences of HCC require repeated treatments, SBRT might be spared for lesions unsuitable for other liver-directed treatments.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Many patients referred for SBRT present with larger lesions than those considered optimal for thermal ablation ( 3 cm) and with tumors for which curative ablation with adequate margins (!6 mm) is not feasible. 9,10 Several studies on SBRT for liver metastases reported a 3-year local control of 66% to 91% and a 3year overall survival of 27% to 65%. [11][12][13] Severe toxicity (grade !3) was limited, and the treatment appeared to be safe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%