2018
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The management of childhood cancer survivors at risk for stroke: A Delphi survey of regional experts

Abstract: Despite lack of evidence to guide stroke prevention in CCS treated with cranial radiation, a panel of regional physicians reached consensus on managing most clinical scenarios. Controversial areas requiring further study are surveillance imaging for asymptomatic survivors, aspirin for stroke prevention, and indications for specialty referral.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of antiplatelet drugs for secondary prevention in previously irradiated brain tumor patients who experience an ischemic stroke is well accepted, even if dedicated studies in this population are lacking [ 43 ]. Conversely, the benefit of low-dose aspirin as primary prevention in patients who did not have an ischemic event remains unproven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of antiplatelet drugs for secondary prevention in previously irradiated brain tumor patients who experience an ischemic stroke is well accepted, even if dedicated studies in this population are lacking [ 43 ]. Conversely, the benefit of low-dose aspirin as primary prevention in patients who did not have an ischemic event remains unproven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consensus‐building approach includes an iterative group survey process to achieve convergence of opinion. It is designed to identify and explore a range of alternative clinical options, to expose and explore underlying assumptions, to capture and evaluate professional opinions spanning a wide range of practice settings, and to work toward clinical consensus 6,7 . This methodology allows the investigation of clinical questions that could not practically be asked in more traditional randomized clinical trials due to the required size and cost of such a trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdominal radiographs were initially performed for surveillance of patients with abdominal pain, but additional imaging studies such as right upper quadrant US or pelvic US were done in accordance with localization of the symptoms and corresponding differential diagnoses [ 8 ]. CT or MRI was performed when there was an indication to assess the tumor (primary or metastatic) extent or when further information that could not be assessed by radiographs or US was needed, such as complications related to pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, intra-abdominal abscess, or stroke with protocols tailored to the clinical question (e.g., CT chest with or without contrast, CT chest with pulmonary angiography, CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast, and MRI brain with diffusion and contrast) [ 4 , 9 11 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%