The Management Nexus of Imperfect Duty: Kantian Views of Virtuous Relations, Reasoned Discourse, and Due Diligence

Abstract

A nexus of imperfect duty, defined as positive commitments that have practical limits, describes business behavior toward building affable and virtuous relations, maintaining reasoned social discourse, and performing the due diligence necessary for making knowledgeable business decisions. A theory of the development and extent of the limits of these imperfect managerial duties is presented here, a theory that in part explains the activities and personnel included under the firm's umbrella. As a result, the nexus of imperfect duty is shown to complement the perfect-duty-based nexus-of-contracts theory of the firm. The existence of flexible trade-offs involving these duties, trade-offs limited by contractual arrangements whether explicit or implicit, is shown to be one of the advantages of imperfect duty for developing business relations.Keywords Kantian imperfect duties and their trade-offs Á Moral judge and moral judgments Á Due diligence Á Theory of the firm

Vulnerability, Moral responsibility, and Moral Obligations: the case of Industrial Action in the Medical and Allied Professions

“…In effect, perfect duties are moral maxims. Imperfect duties, to oneself and others, to the contrary, involve general attitudes that require a consideration of situational, including social factors in decision making (Robinson, 2019 ; White, 2011 ). A physician’s beneficence towards a patient is an example of an imperfect duty.…”

“…A physician’s beneficence towards a patient is an example of an imperfect duty. In his MM (1797, 6:394), Kant equates imperfect duties with virtue, and wide obligations to others (Ibid, 6: 390, cited in Robinson, 2019 , p.123).…”

A Social Mission is Not Enough: Reflecting the Normative Foundations of Social Entrepreneurship

“…Whereas in general mission-centric social entrepreneurship perfect duties stay unaddressed, while imperfect duties can in principle be incorporated into this conception, economistic social entrepreneurship does not acknowledge any duties, whether perfect or imperfect. Thus, in economistic social entrepreneurship the imperfect duty of managerial affability (Robinson 2019), for instance, is not respected either. In economistic social entrepreneurship, affable action may occasionally be taken by social entrepreneurs, if this is conducive to the maximization of the social mission's objective.…”

Equal Pay as a Precondition of Justice?

“…Indeed, as Néron (2010) notes, ethicists working in a variety of traditions have sought to understand businesses as political communities. Examples include work in the Kantian tradition (Robinson 2019), the Aristotelian tradition (Solomon 1994), the Thomistic tradition (Sison and Fontrodona 2012), stakeholder-theory (Freeman and Liedtka 1991) and indeed a variety of other perspectives (Heckscher and Adler 2007). Thus, the present chapter is, in part, an attempt to stimulate further discussion about relational equality within the literature on business and organizational ethics, as well as political philosophy.…”