1978
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1978.4295577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Management Ethics “Crisis”: An Organizational Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may add to this perspective, another one, an axiological dimension. Moral weaknesses in organisations may catalyse a crisis, but also cause such ethical crises (Boling, 1978;Dobrowolski, 2017). Paraskevas (2006) using narrative analysis identified weaknesses in the chain's crisis response.…”
Section: Nature Of Crisis and Crisis Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may add to this perspective, another one, an axiological dimension. Moral weaknesses in organisations may catalyse a crisis, but also cause such ethical crises (Boling, 1978;Dobrowolski, 2017). Paraskevas (2006) using narrative analysis identified weaknesses in the chain's crisis response.…”
Section: Nature Of Crisis and Crisis Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in several cases, they note the success of attempts to develop and apply methods for solving certain classes of typical problems, including in the field of anti-crisis management (Bapuji et al, 2020;Duchek, 2014;Bundy et al, 2017;Schultz et al, 2012;Doern, 2016;Hong et al, 2012). However, most of the above methods, due to a significant number of formal prerequisites that ensure the correct application of mathematical tools, have a rather limited scope of their permissible application and often do not allow taking into account the qualitative characteristics inherent in personnel as an object and subject of anti-crisis management of the enterprise (Williams et al, 2017;Doern et al, 2019;Shrivastava, 1993;Boling, 1978). In addition, in several known problems of this type, the degree of adequacy of the formal description of the mutual influence of internal and external factors does not allow to take into account their correlation correctly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%