1972
DOI: 10.2307/3262920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example 'It is apparent that the theme is closely connected with the trauma of the Johannine Christians' separation from the synagogue.' 19 Other commentary communicates comparable conclusions. The conflict between Johannine Christians and synagogue officials may have found its way in the gospel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For example 'It is apparent that the theme is closely connected with the trauma of the Johannine Christians' separation from the synagogue.' 19 Other commentary communicates comparable conclusions. The conflict between Johannine Christians and synagogue officials may have found its way in the gospel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“… Brown 1970, drawing on Douglas 1966.  See, e. g., Alexander 1997, 319 -30;Meeks 1972, 44-72. See also Pagels 1991, 105 -28, and now Schwarz 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Incarnation, however, transcends eschatological elements and posits Christ as the eternal link between God and man. 66 Barrett, however, has modified his understanding of John's use of the term Son of Man. In the first edition of 1955 he proposed that the speculations about a primal or archetypal man constitute the foundation for the biblical concept of Son of Man.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is highly probable that Stephen and the hellenists played an important role in the christological formulation of a Son of Man theology. 66 Unfortunately the traditions which originated with Stephen and the hellenists are scarce and under suspicion of inaccuracy and fantasy. 67 We may, however, propose several reasons why a Stephenian group of disciples temporarily changed the course of christological definitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%