In this article I discuss transnational burial rituals carried out in London and Sylhet. While collective identity and reaffirming social ties are important issues in discussing the burial of migrants in Sylhet, the main focus of the article is on gender. The analysis of what happens when Londonis die reveals a great deal about the differential effects of living between two places on men and women. While transnationalism may in some contexts be understood as potentially subversive, for the majority of Sylhetis in Britain movement between places is highly constrained by poverty and British immigration controls, as well as by particular gender and household relations. These in turn impact on men and women's experiences of bereavement, as well as on their access to and relationship with the British state.Transnationalism has been defined as 'the processes by which immigrants forge and sustain multi-stranded social relations that link together their societies of origin and settlement ' (Basch et al. 1994: 7). Yet, while this aptly sums up its most salient features, most research into the phenomenon, at least so far, has focused on political or entrepreneurial matters, or on the hegemony of the nation state, activities that largely take place in the public arena. To understand the meanings and implications of transnationalism for ordinary people, however, we need also to consider activities and relationships within households and families. This returns our attention to issues of gender and generation as well as to the 'micro-politics' of resource allocation. It also brings a different perspective to questions of power between places, for, while the global political economy is the setting for transnationalism and its analysis must therefore foreground discussion, we need to understand how the global politics of place articulate with questions of identity, status and culturally specific forms of hierarchy and inequality, all of which require research at the local level.One way to address such issues is to examine ritual, not at the level of transnational or global religious movements, as discussed for example by Werbner (1996) and in the collection edited by Metcalf (1996), but at that of the ceremonies that take place within and between households. As we shall see, the analysis of transnational household rituals tells us a great deal about how places are imagined and acted upon, as well as about the power relations between them. Household rituals, which are often carried out by women, also bring to our attention the much-neglected issue of gender relations, and how these are played out and affected by transnationalism. An associated question, which I do not discuss directly here, concerns relations between generations (see Gardner 2002).