2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The making of ethnic territories: Governmentality and counter-conducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, patterns of subgroup marginalization differ in other countries. In postcolonial contexts, systems of oppression may fall along ethnic lines (Anthias & Hoffmann, 2020). In European contexts, economic insecurity may be most concentrated among recent immigrants (Eugster, 2018).…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, patterns of subgroup marginalization differ in other countries. In postcolonial contexts, systems of oppression may fall along ethnic lines (Anthias & Hoffmann, 2020). In European contexts, economic insecurity may be most concentrated among recent immigrants (Eugster, 2018).…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active role of deities in the local political landscape, in fact, well preceded the arrival of the so-called modern political structures of post-Independence India. Their existing sovereignty and presence as governing authorities in a postcolonial context provides a crucial insight into a ‘more geographically sensitive and provincialised understanding of contemporary governmentalities’ (Anthias and Hoffman 2021: 223). With its local conceptions of territorial sovereignty and systems of governmentality the deity institution sets the stage for what Foucault refers to as ‘counter-conduct’ (Foucault 2007; Anthias and Hoffman 2021) when seen in juxtaposition to state governmentality.…”
Section: Converging Agenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their existing sovereignty and presence as governing authorities in a postcolonial context provides a crucial insight into a ‘more geographically sensitive and provincialised understanding of contemporary governmentalities’ (Anthias and Hoffman 2021: 223). With its local conceptions of territorial sovereignty and systems of governmentality the deity institution sets the stage for what Foucault refers to as ‘counter-conduct’ (Foucault 2007; Anthias and Hoffman 2021) when seen in juxtaposition to state governmentality. In the postcolonial, political sphere of contemporary Kullu, then, a distinct set of factors involving human as well as non-human actors is at play.…”
Section: Converging Agenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual titles are often used as collateral on loans that farmers may struggle to pay back ( [30], see also Bateman, this issue), creating increased commercial pressure on land [31] and allowing for its commodification. Further, multiple critiques of the colonial and post-colonial legacies of property show that modern legal frameworks reinforce discrimination and facilitate the dispossession of Indigenous land by modifying the legal nature of entitlement, such as the spatial extent, alienability or conditionality [19,32,33]. As Nichols lays out, "to speak meaningfully of dispossession appears to presuppose a prior relation of possession" [34].…”
Section: Land Titling and Temporalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%