2020
DOI: 10.17863/cam.60248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maker movement and its impact in the fight against COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reviews and overviews have already been done on the topics of Open Design (Bakırlıoğlu & Kohtala, 2019;Boisseau et al, 2018;Menichinelli, 2016) and of design, making, open approaches and the Maker movement for healthcare (Campos & Cipolla, 2021;Corsini et al, 2020;Maffei et al, 2018). We thus narrowed down the field and focused on the specific topic of design for DIY healthcare devices, focusing on Jose Gomez-Marquez's research at Little Devices Lab and practice at MakerHealth (Dellal et al, 2018;Gomez-Marquez & Hamad-Schifferli, 2019, 2021Gomez-Marquez & Spinrad, 2012;Phillips et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several reviews and overviews have already been done on the topics of Open Design (Bakırlıoğlu & Kohtala, 2019;Boisseau et al, 2018;Menichinelli, 2016) and of design, making, open approaches and the Maker movement for healthcare (Campos & Cipolla, 2021;Corsini et al, 2020;Maffei et al, 2018). We thus narrowed down the field and focused on the specific topic of design for DIY healthcare devices, focusing on Jose Gomez-Marquez's research at Little Devices Lab and practice at MakerHealth (Dellal et al, 2018;Gomez-Marquez & Hamad-Schifferli, 2019, 2021Gomez-Marquez & Spinrad, 2012;Phillips et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenomena have had an impact on design in other sectors too, such as biology with the DIYBio/Biohacking movement (Delfanti, 2013;Keulartz & van den Belt, 2016;Landrain et al, 2013;Wohlsen, 2011), a further expansion and development of the Maker movement in biology (Tocchetti, 2012), or healthcare -that is patients facing technologies. These can range from patient-centered innovation to makers designing healthcare devices (Gomez-Marquez & Spinrad, 2012) to more recent fabrication of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the first months of the Covid-19 pandemic emergency (Campos & Cipolla, 2021;Corsini et al, 2020;Maffei et al, 2018). DIY and making in healthcare did not evolve from the Maker or DIYBio/Biohacking movements, but in parallel to them, in certain cases preceding them (Gomez-Marquez & Young, 2016;Mahler, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the maker COVID-19 response initiatives strongly relied on the sharing of open designs and a self-organized production and dispatchment of the DIY equipment, via online and social media (Corsini et al, 2020;Zastrow, 2020). When a certain material was not locally available alternatives were explored, either by modifying the design, adapting material that was already available or hacking different parts of the product design (Fabfoundation, 2020).…”
Section: Maker's Covid-19 Response Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volunteer-driven, self-organized activities of the maker community have significantly contributed to the response phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and also drew attention to the latent innovation potential of the general public (Corsini et al, 2020). Since the rapid emerging of local makerspaces, hackerspaces, fablabs and the calling out of a global maker movement (Dougherty, 2012) experts have assigned this new culture of local manufacturing certain social transformation power (Diez, 2012;Smith, 2017;Millard et al, 2018;Bosse et al, 2019;Unterfrauner et al, 2020).…”
Section: Social and Transformative Innovation Theory And Societal Imp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COVID-19 has had an enduring impact on the mindfulness of spending habits, particularly as they pertain to sustainability, increased demand via digital access, a reorientation of brand loyalty, prioritization of companies who support the caring economy, and a 'homebody' economy with increased purchases of goods used within the household (Arora et al 2020). Although the impact of COVID-19 on small businesses has been immensely damaging (Bartik et al 2020), there is some evidence that smallerscale, peer-to-peer consumption has increased ) and that 'Makers' have stepped up to support community needs Ravi et al 2021;Corsini et al 2020).…”
Section: A Handmade Futurementioning
confidence: 99%