Almost everyone agrees that Nietzsche is a skeptic about the objectivity of morality, 1 but beyond that point, disagreement abounds as to the grounds for this skepticism, its scope, and its implications for the semantics of moral judgment. In this essay, I will set out a systematic view on the first two questions (concerning the grounds and scope of his skepticism), building on some prior work (Leiter 2000; Leiter 2002: 136-155). 2 I will assume throughout that Nietzsche"s skepticism about the objectivity of morality is not simply a special instance of the skepticism that is sometimes associated with his doctrine of perspectivism-that is, I will assume that it is not simply an instance of generalized skepticism about our knowledge of the world or a global skepticism about truth. There is probably a modest consensus now among Anglophone interpreters of