The Maintenance of Verbal Exchanges between Young Children

Mueller, Edward

doi:10.2307/1127643

Cited by 149 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Identical results were found by Parten (1932) and Reuter and Yunick (1973). Verbal interactions increase (Berk, 1971;Garvey & Hogan, 1973;McGrew, 1972;Reuter & Yunick, 1973) and reciprocity in both verbal behavior (Mueller, 1972) and positive contacts Hartup, Glazer, & Charlesworth, 1967;Kohn, 1966;Marshall & McCandless, 1957;Moore, 1967) occurs. Social contacts in general (Gott, 1934) become more frequent as children grow older.…”

Section: Rationalementioning

confidence: 99%

Sex Differences in Social Development

Lueke

2016

Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Rationalementioning

confidence: 99%

Sex Differences in Social Development

Lueke

2016

Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Comparison of samples collected in a variety of settings, e.g., home, clinic, and playroom, have been made (Mueller, 1972;Johnson, 1974;Longhurst and Grubb, 1974).…”

Section: Structural Complexity Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

Developmental sentence scoring : a comparative study conducted in Portland, Oregon

McCluskey¹

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conducted in Portland, Oregon. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE:rdon, Chairperson RO ert:H:Englis~Oral language sampling and analysis are tools available to the speech-language clinician, which are often helpful in obtaining information regarding the development of expressive language in children. In the past, a child's language has been judged to be mature based upon the length of the utterance and/or the granunatical complexity.The purpose of this investigation was to replicate the study conducted by Lee and Canter (1971) and Lee (1974a) Although slight variation in the examiner's form 3 of elicitation and use of stimulus materials may possibly explain some of the differences found in the grammatical categories, it appears an unlikely possibility that this variation could account for the statistically significant difference found between the mean DSS scores of the two studies.In addition, the differences do not appear to be the result of stimulus materials or transcription methods used.The norms compiled by Lee (1974a) in the Midwest, differ significantly from those obtained in this study, conducted in Portland, Oregon. It appears likely that score differences in other geographical areas may exist as well.In order to conduct a thorough and competent evaluation of a child's expressive language abilities, the data from this investigation reflect the need for the speech-language clinician to use the DSS norms cautiously and/or to establish norms specific to a geographical region.

show abstract

“…Later researchers have also coded children's speech as contingent or not on the previous speaker's utterance (e.g. Garvey & Hogan, 1973;Mueller, 1972).…”

Section: B the Egocentrism Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Referential Communication

Asher¹

1979

The Functions of Language and Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Maintenance of Verbal Exchanges between Young Children

Cited by 149 publications

References 6 publications

Sex Differences in Social Development

Sex Differences in Social Development

Developmental sentence scoring : a comparative study conducted in Portland, Oregon

Referential Communication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About