The Maintenance of Genetic Variation Due to Asymmetric Gene Flow in Dendritic Metapopulations

Abstract

Dendritic landscapes can have ecological properties that differ importantly from simpler spatial arrangements of habitats. Most dendritic landscapes are structured by elevation, and therefore, migration is likely to be directionally biased. While the populationgenetic consequences of both dendritic landscape arrangements and asymmetric migration have begun to be studied, these processes have not been considered together. Simple conceptual models predict that if migration into branch (headwater) populations is limited, such populations can act as reservoirs for potentially unique alleles. As a consequence of the fact that dendritic landscapes have, by definition, more branches than internal habitat patches, this process may lead to the maintenance of higher overall genetic diversities in metapopulations inhabiting dendritic networks where migration is directionally biased. Here we begin to address the generality of these simple predictions using genetic models and a review of empirical literature. We show, for a range of demographic parameters, that dendritic systems with asymmetric migration can maintain levels of genetic variation that are very different, sometimes very elevated, compared with more classical models of geographical population structure. Furthermore, predicted patterns of genetic variation within metapopulations-that is, stepwise increases in genetic diversity at nodesdo occur in some empirical data.

Condition and Phenotype-Dependent Dispersal in a Damselfly, Calopteryx splendens

“…Freshwater insects are often considered to form metapopulations [77], [78]. Our results suggest that density dependent dispersal and the lek mating system could be related: individuals in a lek are more abundant, and hence the lek is more attractive, which means that individuals from low density sites are attracted to high density sites (i.e.…”

Genetic changes caused by restocking and hydroelectric dams in demographically bottlenecked brown trout in a transnational subarctic riverine system

“…However, in the stocked river Theoretical and simulation studies (Morrissey & de Kerckhove, 2009;Paz-Vinas, Loot, Stevens, & Blanchet, 2015) predict that population sizes and genetic diversity might be naturally higher in downstream than in upstream river sections. However, in the stocked river Theoretical and simulation studies (Morrissey & de Kerckhove, 2009;Paz-Vinas, Loot, Stevens, & Blanchet, 2015) predict that population sizes and genetic diversity might be naturally higher in downstream than in upstream river sections.…”

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Dispersal and Population Structure in Small, Isolated Desert Populations of West African Crocodiles

“…Demographics and genetic structure is highly influenced by water-level fluctuations in water-dependent species. The present spatial dynamics of this metapopulation system would resemble the source-sink dynamics described for other aquatic organisms in which upstream populations serve as sources and downstream populations as sinks [55]. Such spatial dynamics makes upstream colonization less probable and reduces the likeliness of rescue effect in upstream populations [56].…”