The main achievements of the EU structural funds 2007?2013 in the EU member states: efficiency analysis of transport sector

Abstract

Research background: The European Union currently provides financial support to the Member States through various financial tools from European Structural and Investment Funds 2014–2020, and previously from the EU Structural Funds. In both terminologies, the funds represent the main instrument of EU Cohesion Policy to sustain territorial development, to increase competitiveness and to eliminate regional disparities. The overall impact of EU Funds depends on the structure of funding and absorption capacity of the country.
 Purpose of the article: The efficiency of funding across the EU Member States is a fundamental issue for EU development as a whole. The Author considers deter-mining the efficiency of EU Funds as an issue of high importance, and therefore this paper provides a contribution to the debate on the role of EU Cohesion Policy in the Member States. The paper focuses on territorial effects of relevant EU Funds in programming period 2007–2013 in infrastructure through efficiency analysis.
 Methods: Efficiency analysis is based on data at the country level, originating from ex-post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2007–2013 and representing the input and output variables to analyse whether the goal of fostering growth in the target countries have been achieved with the funds provided, and whether or not more resources generated stronger growth effects in transport accessibility. The paper deals with comparative cross-country analysis, descriptive analysis of dataset and multiple-criteria approach of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the form of output-oriented BCC VRS model of efficiency and output-oriented APM VRS subsequently model of super-efficiency.
 Findings & Value added: The paper aims to test the factors of two inputs and five outputs, trying to elucidate the differences obtained by the Member States in effective use of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in the transport sector. The paper determines if the countries have been more efficient in increasing their levels of competitive advantages linked with transport. Preliminary results reveal that most countries with a lower amount of funding achieve higher efficiency, especially countries in a group of so-called “old EU Member States”, i.e. group EU15.

Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Annual Reports in the EU—A Czech Case Study

“…The e-reporting on CSR is the hallmark of a current relationship and interaction of a wide spectrum of stakeholders in the internal single market [32,57], which is only partially covered by mandatory, expressed and explicit legal norms [27,38]. Ultimately, the above described legislative framework includes ambiguities, terminological imprecision and even vacuums and the alleged split between old and new EU member states reappears [58], in particular in the light of Europe 2020 [59][60][61]. Nevertheless, one can argue that it implies a general rule that shareholder companies and limited liability companies with more than 500 employees have to include CSR information in their annual reports and file them with their national Commercial Registers.…”

Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Annual Reports in the EU – A Czech Case Study

“…Today's global, complex, highly competitive and heavily digitalized society brings forth many challenges for European integration [36,42,57]. The EU and its EU member states attempt to address them by various instruments designed to promote competitiveness, transparency and communication with different levels of effectiveness and efficiency [58][59][60][61][62]. The prior proposition that the implementation of the concept of CSR is not obligatory [48] and that it will be freely embraced by subjects progressively recognizing its benefits has been modified by clear indices and even demands of the EU law and often even national laws making the CSR concept and basic (not detailed) reporting about its realization compulsory for certain subjects.…”

The Analysis of the Case Law of the Court of Justice of Eu on the Unfair Commerical Practices

“…The current ten year strategy for the EU, aka Europe 2020, has three prioritiessmart, sustainable and inclusive growth (EC 2010), and aims to develop the technological and other potentials of the European economy (Balcerzak 2016a) in order to reach a higher and similar competitive level in the entire EU with a focus on social responsible stability (Pakšiová 2016). The goals of Europe 2020 lie in the perception of fact that a common market or internal market requires a certain degree of homogeneity in economic development of countries, which is not necessarily an automatic outcome of the European integration process but, eventually, has to be assisted by active policy interventions (both European or/and national interventions) what Europe 2020 represent (Melecký 2018). The EU 2020 R&D target is hard to reach for some of CEE region countries (Bočková & Meluzín 2016).…”