1996
DOI: 10.1086/178151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Magnetohydrodynamics of Supersonic Gas Clouds: MHD Cosmic Bullets and Wind‐swept Clumps

Abstract: We report an extensive set of two-dimensional MHD simulations exploring the role and evolution of magnetic fields in the dynamics of supersonic plasma clumps. We examine the influence of both ambient field strength and orientation on the problem. Of those two characteristics, field orientation is far more important in the cases we have considered with β 0 = p g /p b ≥ 1. That is due to the geometry-sensitivity of field stretching/amplification from large-scale shearing motions around the bullet. When the ambie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
157
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This will then determine the class of the given cloud distribution, à I or à M . For cloud distributions from the set à I with average cloud separation hDy N i > d crit , evolution of the clouds during the compression, re-expansion, and destruction phases will proceed in the noninteracting regime, and the formalism for a single-cloud interaction with a shock wave (e.g., Klein et al 1994;Jones et al 1996;Mac Low et al 1994;Lim & Raga 1999) can be used to describe the system. On the other hand, if the cloud separation is less than the critical distance, the clouds in the layer will merge into a single structure before their destruction is completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will then determine the class of the given cloud distribution, à I or à M . For cloud distributions from the set à I with average cloud separation hDy N i > d crit , evolution of the clouds during the compression, re-expansion, and destruction phases will proceed in the noninteracting regime, and the formalism for a single-cloud interaction with a shock wave (e.g., Klein et al 1994;Jones et al 1996;Mac Low et al 1994;Lim & Raga 1999) can be used to describe the system. On the other hand, if the cloud separation is less than the critical distance, the clouds in the layer will merge into a single structure before their destruction is completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…035 of the determination of the jet ridge in this image reported by Blundell & Bowler, (2004). For the settings of the jet dynamics we chose the following characteristic values: a geometry factor η = 1; a ratio l sh /l cl = 0.5 of the thickness of the radio bright shells around the jet clouds to the size of the clouds, the finding of Inoue et al, (2012) for supernova remnants; a pressure ratio of the thermal gas and magnetic field β g = 1, which is expected in the vicinity of the jet clouds, where the magnetic field is amplified by the shocks (Jones et al, 1996;Inoue et al, 2012); a ratio of the energy densities of the magnetic field and relativistic particles β H = 3/4, which corresponds minimum total energy of the field and particles (Ginzburg, 1979, p. 95); an initial flux of kinetic energy in the jet per cloud fraction, L k ≡Ṁ j v 2 j /2 = 10 39 erg/s, and a temperature of the jet clouds T cl = 2 × 10 4 K at a distance of 10 15 cm, which are very tightly determined for the optical jet . The jet mass-fluxṀ j was assumed to be constant throughout the jet length.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Dynamical Jets Of Ss 433mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electric fields produced by jet-stretched magnetic field lines around an obstacle would also accelerate particles (e.g. Jones et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%