1962
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(62)90010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The magnetic susceptibility of cupric oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0
11

Year Published

1969
1969
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
68
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,5 Between T N1 and T N2 , the magnetic structure is incommensurate with different propagation vectors reported by different authors, as summarized by Aïn et al 5 Nevertheless, all authors report only small incommensurability in this phase; e.g., Forsyth et al observed a propagation vector of (0.506 0 −0.483). 2 The magnetic susceptibility measurement reported by O'Keeffe et al 1 and then confirmed more recently by Köbler et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2,3,5 Between T N1 and T N2 , the magnetic structure is incommensurate with different propagation vectors reported by different authors, as summarized by Aïn et al 5 Nevertheless, all authors report only small incommensurability in this phase; e.g., Forsyth et al observed a propagation vector of (0.506 0 −0.483). 2 The magnetic susceptibility measurement reported by O'Keeffe et al 1 and then confirmed more recently by Köbler et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[14][15][16] However, Table II also shows that the in-plane and interplane interactions appear at equal strength, suggesting that CuO does not really belong to the onedimensional antiferromagnetic compounds, which disagrees with experimental findings. 1,11 We shall see that this is due to the use of a spin-unrestricted approach at the Hartree-Fock level. Semiempirical approaches to the DFT calculations, either by introducing an effective internal energy U to the LDA Hamiltonian or mixing LDA and exact Hartree-Fock exchange functionals, can recover coupling constants which are in a good agreement with experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that hysteresis is present even at temperatures above the Néel temperature in CuO nanoparticles, which is quite unusual, and the origin of this is most likely the low dimensionality of CuO and a short range magnetic order which is present above the Néel temperature. [20,[22][23][24] The fact that this short range order does not lead to any hysteresis in the bulk material means that it is antiferromagnetic in nature. This short range antiferromagnetic order gives rise to a weak ferromagnetism in the nanoparticles, which in turn causes the observed hysteresis even at room temperature, by the mechanism suggested by Néel.…”
Section: Hysteresis Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known experimentally by neutron scattering, specific heat and magnetic susceptibility studies that CuO undergoes a transition to an incommensurate antiferromagnetic state at its Néel temperature 230 K followed by a transition from the incommensurate to a commensurate antiferromagnetic state at 213 K. [20][21][22] However, strangely, the magnetic susceptibility of CuO instead of peaking at its Néel temperature undergoes a change in slope there and shows a broad maximum at about 540 K. [23] This behavior has been claimed by many authors as a manifestation of its quasi one dimensional nature and the related presence of some sort of short range order above the Néel temperature. [20,22,24] There have been claims that CuO can be visualized to have a spin fluid state above the Néel temperature where the spins are thought to be dynamically correlated over several lattice spacings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%