2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Magnetic Response of the Solar Atmosphere to Umbral Flashes

Abstract: Chromospheric observations of sunspot umbrae offer an exceptional view of magneto-acoustic shock phenomena and the impact they have on the surrounding magnetically-dominated plasma. We employ simultaneous slit-based spectro-polarimetry and spectral imaging observations of the chromospheric He I 10830 Å and Ca II 8542 Å lines to examine fluctuations in the umbral magnetic field caused by the steepening of magneto-acoustic waves into umbral flashes. Following the application of modern inversion routines, we find… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(105 reference statements)
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSE measured for the magnetic field increases with the length of the wavelength step, although no strong differences are found for wavelength samplings with δλ 85 mÅ. Even in the case of wavelength samplings that give the best results for the magnetic field during the UF, the error is about 200 G. This value is comparable to the magnetic field fluctuations attributed to UFs as reported by several authors (Joshi & de la Cruz Rodríguez 2018;Houston et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The RMSE measured for the magnetic field increases with the length of the wavelength step, although no strong differences are found for wavelength samplings with δλ 85 mÅ. Even in the case of wavelength samplings that give the best results for the magnetic field during the UF, the error is about 200 G. This value is comparable to the magnetic field fluctuations attributed to UFs as reported by several authors (Joshi & de la Cruz Rodríguez 2018;Houston et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Interestingly, the largest average ∆T (+19.6%) occurs at an optical depth of log 10 τ = −5, corresponding to an approximate geometric height of 1150 km (Maltby et al 1986), which is consistent with examinations of resonantly-amplified fast-mode shocks where Grant et al (2018) found the largest temperature perturbations to be within the range of −5.3 < log 10 τ < −4.6. With this in mind, the pixels we identify as 'active' have clear similarities to previously detected MHD shock phenomena, with characteristics related to the temperature and LOS velocity perturbations closely resembling the signatures synonymous with magnetoacoustic (e.g., Houston et al 2018) and fast-mode (Grant et al 2018) shocks. However, we can now employ the high-precision vector magnetic fields to further categorize the underlying shock behavior.…”
Section: Velocity and Temperature Changessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The shaded regions indicate the spatially and temporally averaged standard deviations corresponding to offsets between the input and synthetic profiles. The confinement of the wavelengthdependent standard deviations (blue shaded regions in Figure 2) shows statistically a high degree of precision throughout the inversion process, something that is also highlighted by Houston et al (2018). Figure 3 displays the fractional uncertainties for the derived NICOLE parameters.…”
Section: Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations