1984
DOI: 10.1118/1.595562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The magnetic field dependence of water proton T1 in aqueous solutions: Implications for magnetic imaging contrast media

Abstract: The magnetic field dependence of the water proton nuclear magnetic relaxation induced by a nitroxide radical both free and covalently bound to serum albumin has been measured from 0.23 mT to 0.7 T. The field dependence of the water proton 1/T1 shows only a minor dependence on the degree of radical immobilization, though the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum is very sensitive to the correlation time of the radical. The results and theory are described in more detail elsewhere (Journal of Chemical Physics, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One challenge for assessment is the absence of a gold-standard measurement technique to determine blood flow in the nervous system. Studies have used a variety of techniques ( Table 1 ), including intravital microscopy ( 49 ), hydrogen clearance (HC) ( 13 , 80 82 ), laser Doppler flowmetry ( 42 , 48 , 83 – 85 ), ultrasound ( 86 88 ), and numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, including arterial spin labeling ( 89 , 90 ), dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) ( 91 , 92 ), phase contrast ( 93 , 94 ), blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) ( 95 , 96 ), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) ( 97 ). HC measures hydrogen gas washout via electrode probe, whereas laser Doppler and ultrasound work by measuring frequency shift from reflected light or sound from moving red blood cells; these all require close proximity or direct contact of the probe head with the nerve.…”
Section: Measuring Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge for assessment is the absence of a gold-standard measurement technique to determine blood flow in the nervous system. Studies have used a variety of techniques ( Table 1 ), including intravital microscopy ( 49 ), hydrogen clearance (HC) ( 13 , 80 82 ), laser Doppler flowmetry ( 42 , 48 , 83 – 85 ), ultrasound ( 86 88 ), and numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, including arterial spin labeling ( 89 , 90 ), dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) ( 91 , 92 ), phase contrast ( 93 , 94 ), blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) ( 95 , 96 ), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) ( 97 ). HC measures hydrogen gas washout via electrode probe, whereas laser Doppler and ultrasound work by measuring frequency shift from reflected light or sound from moving red blood cells; these all require close proximity or direct contact of the probe head with the nerve.…”
Section: Measuring Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%