1994
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0763(199412)1:2<93::aid-arp6140010203>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The magnetic anomaly of a brick foundation

Abstract: This experiment was done at the foundation of a chapel that was constructed about 300 years ago at St Mary's City, Maryland, in the USA. The magnetic anomaly of this foundation is irregular and lumpy. The magnetic map does not show a uniform band with a high magnetic field along the line of the foundation; instead, it shows a series of high readings spaced unevenly near the foundation. This irregularity is caused by the addition and subtraction of the remanent magnetization of randomly oriented bricks in the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GPR profiles show numerous small hyperbolas within the cellar that might be produced by large rocks or metal objects buried within the soil that fills the cellar (Bevan et al, 1984;Conyers, 2004). This interpretation is supported by observations of magnetic anomalies (Figure 7c; Bevan, 1994).…”
Section: Structuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The GPR profiles show numerous small hyperbolas within the cellar that might be produced by large rocks or metal objects buried within the soil that fills the cellar (Bevan et al, 1984;Conyers, 2004). This interpretation is supported by observations of magnetic anomalies (Figure 7c; Bevan, 1994).…”
Section: Structuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This property has made the magnetic method highly efficient in tracing architecture in dozens of surveys carried out on ancient sites in the Nile Valley (Fassbinder, 2017b ; Herbich, 2003 , 2019 ; Spencer, 2012 ). The other building material in use at Old Dongola, but to a far lesser extent, is baked brick; it is characterized by thermoremanent magnetization reaching 10 × 10 −3 SI (Bevan, 1994 ). The accumulated deposits in which these building remains are found consist mainly of sand, which can show magnetic susceptibility growing to 1.5 × 10 −3 SI due to minerals with a high content of iron oxides, but the overall magnetic contrast between the two kinds of bricks and the sandy matrix is sufficiently strong to register anomalies related to the brick structures.…”
Section: Methodology Of Geophysical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of magnetic enhancement is greatest when the affected materials retain their spatial relationship, such as in an in situ kiln. When fired materials are found in different orientations relative to their thermally created magnetic field (such as in a collection of fired bricks in a wall) their directions of magnetisation are dispersed and the cumulative effect can be reduced (Bevan 1994). Despite this, the incorporation of broken ceramics and bricks into the soil can result in an increased magnetic signature (Weston 2002).…”
Section: Potential Targets For Archaeological Prospection In Pngmentioning
confidence: 99%