1998
DOI: 10.1080/00346769800000043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Macroeconomics of Work Time

Abstract: In this paper we demonstrate that because of stagnating wages and rising job insecurity, there has been a change in the labor supply regime in the U.S. macroeconomy since the 1970s. There is now greater labor supply at any given officially measured unemployment rate. This induced growth in the quantity of labor effort is coming from experienced, incumbent workers and therefore does not show up in the official unemployment rate. While this may diminish family and community life, the increased aggregate labor su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this relationship could be that, as Bell and Freeman (2001) propose, labour supply decisions are forward looking: people work longer hours to avoid being laid off during recessions. In the face of high unemployment rates especially, workers prefer additional work hours to layoffs and when future layoffs are anticipated, they seek additional earnings for income smoothing (see Bluestone and Rose 1998). Indeed, as Anger (2006) points out, when high unemployment rates impose a risk of future layoffs, even the willingness to work unpaid overtime is greater, and if workers expect to be under-or unemployed in the future, they are less likely to state a preference for fewer hours (Golden and Gebreselassie 2007, p. 19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this relationship could be that, as Bell and Freeman (2001) propose, labour supply decisions are forward looking: people work longer hours to avoid being laid off during recessions. In the face of high unemployment rates especially, workers prefer additional work hours to layoffs and when future layoffs are anticipated, they seek additional earnings for income smoothing (see Bluestone and Rose 1998). Indeed, as Anger (2006) points out, when high unemployment rates impose a risk of future layoffs, even the willingness to work unpaid overtime is greater, and if workers expect to be under-or unemployed in the future, they are less likely to state a preference for fewer hours (Golden and Gebreselassie 2007, p. 19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is most clear is that the last few decades may be more accurately characterized as one of polarization of work hours or a time-divide (Bluestone and Rose, 1998;Drago, 2000;Jacobs and Gerson, 2004;Messenger, 2004). The share of employed men working 50 or more hours per week has been rising among highly educated, high-wage, salaried and older-aged workers (Drago et al, 2005;Epstein and Kalleberg, 2004;Kuhn and Lozano, 2006).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among those who expect to be in managerial positions, there is a positive relationship between the number of work hours they prefer and the actual work hours of their co-workers (Brett and Stroh, 2003;Eastman, 1998;Feldman, 2002). There is also an incentive to put in extra hours of work to amass savings or serve a protective device against the risk of future job loss, demotion or pay cut, particularly if the extent of job or income insecurity is rising (Bluestone and Rose, 1998).…”
Section: Work As Forward-looking Investments In Future Wage Growth Trmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The prior literature refers mostly to periods of economic growth, but there has been little research into the effects of recession on working time mismatches (Bell and Blanchflower 2011;Bluestone and Rose 1998). This study contributes to existing research about the ways in which the quality of work has been affected by the economic crisis.…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 66%