QSO Hosts and Their Environments 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0695-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Luminosity Function of QSO Host Galaxies

Abstract: We report on results from H band imaging observations of a complete sample of high-luminosity low-redshift QSOs. The luminosity function of QSO hosts is similar in shape to that of normal galaxies, although offset in normalisation by a factor of 10 −4 . This supports the hypothesis that the parent population of quasars is identical to the general population of early-type field galaxies. IntroductionIdentifying the parent population of QSO host galaxies is one of the fundamental problems linking the QSO phenome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, it is clear that the AGNs and nearby inactive‐galaxy samples follow the same M bh – L bulge relation over >3 decades in black hole mass, and >2.5 decades in bulge luminosity. This second fact strongly supports the conclusions of Dunlop et al (2001) and Wisotzki et al (2001) that the host galaxies of powerful quasars are normal massive ellipticals drawn from the bright end of the elliptical galaxy luminosity function. Thirdly, there can be seen to be no systematic offset between the Seyfert 1 and quasar samples, reinforcing the findings of MD01 and Laor (2001) that, contrary to the results of Wandel (1999), the bulges of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs form a continuous sequence that ranges from M R (bulge)≃‐18 to M R (bulge)≃‐24.5.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Bulge Luminosity and Black Hole Masssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Secondly, it is clear that the AGNs and nearby inactive‐galaxy samples follow the same M bh – L bulge relation over >3 decades in black hole mass, and >2.5 decades in bulge luminosity. This second fact strongly supports the conclusions of Dunlop et al (2001) and Wisotzki et al (2001) that the host galaxies of powerful quasars are normal massive ellipticals drawn from the bright end of the elliptical galaxy luminosity function. Thirdly, there can be seen to be no systematic offset between the Seyfert 1 and quasar samples, reinforcing the findings of MD01 and Laor (2001) that, contrary to the results of Wandel (1999), the bulges of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs form a continuous sequence that ranges from M R (bulge)≃‐18 to M R (bulge)≃‐24.5.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Bulge Luminosity and Black Hole Masssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Supernova feedback is not powerful enough to affect the gas in massive haloes significantly unless the rate of formation of massive stars is especially high, but then these galaxies would no longer be red. A similar argument can apply to feedback from quasars since early‐type galaxies are 10 4 times more common than quasars at low redshifts (Wisotzki, Kuhlbrodt & Jahnke 2001). This is a serious problem for models in which AGNs are supposed to interact with the halo gas through radiative processes such as radiation pressure or Compton scattering.…”
Section: New Elements In the Galaxy Formation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is well established that powerful radio emission is almost exclusively associated with the spheroidal component of galaxies. However, at any given epoch, an overwhelming majority of luminous spheroidal galaxies sampled is found to be radio-quiet (e.g., Wisotzki et al 2001). One oft discussed possibility, based on direct observations, is that galaxy mergers or interactions could be playing an important role in radio activity, as indicated by the frequent presence of optical isophotal distortions, shells and dust lanes seen in radio-loud ellipticals, particularly in the more powerful Fanaroff-Riley (1974) Class II (FR II) radio galaxies (RGs) (e.g., Heckman et al 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%