2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13181.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The luminosities and distance scales of type II Cepheid and RR Lyrae variables

Abstract: Infrared and optical absolute magnitudes are derived for the type II Cepheids κ Pav and VY Pyx using revised Hipparcos parallaxes and for κ Pav, V553 Cen and SW Tau from pulsational parallaxes. Revised Hipparcos and HST parallaxes for RR Lyrae agree satisfactorily and are combined in deriving absolute magnitudes. Phase‐corrected J, H and Ks mags are given for 142 Hipparcos RR Lyraes based on Two‐Micron All‐Sky Survey observations. Pulsation and trigonometrical parallaxes for classical Cepheids are compared to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
173
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(194 reference statements)
12
173
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for κ Pav, the pulsational parallax estimated by Feast et al (2008) through BW analysis is about 2σ smaller than the trigonometric parallax measured by HST and adopted here (∆π = 0.67 ± 0.33 mas). Feast et al (2008) investigated the possible causes of the discrepancy with respect to the Hipparcos parallax (van Leeuwen 2007), which was even larger than the HST one, but did not find any definitive explanation. A well known potential problem related with the application of the BW technique is the uncertainty on the projection factor p (see, e.g.…”
Section: Absolute Calibration Of P L P Lc and P W Relationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As for κ Pav, the pulsational parallax estimated by Feast et al (2008) through BW analysis is about 2σ smaller than the trigonometric parallax measured by HST and adopted here (∆π = 0.67 ± 0.33 mas). Feast et al (2008) investigated the possible causes of the discrepancy with respect to the Hipparcos parallax (van Leeuwen 2007), which was even larger than the HST one, but did not find any definitive explanation. A well known potential problem related with the application of the BW technique is the uncertainty on the projection factor p (see, e.g.…”
Section: Absolute Calibration Of P L P Lc and P W Relationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, this would allow us to obtain an independent measure of the distance to the LMC and to the GGCs hosting T2CEP variables. (Feast et al 2008). However, VY Pyx turned out to be a peculiar star, unusable as calibrator (see discussion in Benedict et al 2011).…”
Section: Absolute Calibration Of P L P Lc and P W Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations