2019
DOI: 10.1017/s001675681900102x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower–middle Viséan boundary interval in the Palaeotethys: refinements for the foraminiferal zonal schemes

Abstract: A new foraminiferal subzone (Cf5α or MFZ12α) in between the classical foraminiferal zonal biozones is characterized by the first occurrence of Archaediscus at concavus stage, primitive species of Pojarkovella, as well as the first Endothyranopsis s.s. This interval is represented in England, France and Morocco (in the western Palaeotethys) and in South China, and more widely in Iran (in the eastern Palaeotethys), where it is partly similar to the MFZ11B subzone defined by previous authors. The position of this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the specimen from bed d of Strank (1981) is a misidentified Plectogyranopsis settlensis (Conil & Longerstaey in Conil et al ., 1980), which is first recorded from the upper part of the Arundian or early Visean (Cózar et al . 2020 a ).…”
Section: Biostratigraphy Of the Little Asby Scar Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the specimen from bed d of Strank (1981) is a misidentified Plectogyranopsis settlensis (Conil & Longerstaey in Conil et al ., 1980), which is first recorded from the upper part of the Arundian or early Visean (Cózar et al . 2020 a ).…”
Section: Biostratigraphy Of the Little Asby Scar Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the foraminiferal-defined base of the Holkerian in the Barker Scar section has now been revised (Cózar et al, 2022), demonstrating that the microfauna previously proposed by George et al (1976), Conil et al (1980, Ramsbottom (1981), Strank (1981) and Fewtrell et al (1981), as well as other worldwide middle Viséan taxa (Cózar et al, 2020a), first occur in much lower levels in the Barker Scar section, at bed C. Cózar et al (2022), proposed to reposition the base of the Holkerian to coincide with the foraminiferal markers at bed C in the upper Dalton Formation, thereby, giving the base Holkerian a robust international correlation with the middle Viséan. The alternative position of maintaining the base of the Holkerian at bed K is problematic, since there are no fossil markers to recognise it beyond Barker Scar.…”
Section: Defining the Arundian-holkerian Boundarymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, Forschiella prisca is considered also a valid guide for the Cf4γ subzone. This subzone is equivalent to the MFZ11β of Cózar et al (2020a).…”
Section: Conilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in summary, the foraminiferal data suggests that the Stormy Limestone Formation in South Wales reached the highest level of the Holkerian substage, the Cf5β subzone of Cózar et al (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another group of transitional forms with important biostratigraphic implications are those within the evolutionary stages in Archaediscus. Thus, the transitional forms between the involutus and concavus stages (with some whorls at concavus stage), first occur from the top of the early Viséan (Cf4δ or MFZ11γ subzones; Cózar et al 2020).…”
Section: Transitional Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%