2014
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/14/9/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower limit of the Doppler factor for a Fermi blazar sample

Abstract: We selected 457 blazars (193 flat spectrum radio quasars, 61 lowsynchrotron peaked blazars, 69 intermediate-synchrotron peaked blazars and 134 high-synchrotron peaked blazars) from the second Fermi-LAT catalog (2FGL) of γray sources, which have X-ray observations. We calculated the lower limits for their Doppler factors, δ γ , and compared the lower limits with the available Doppler factors and the apparent superluminal velocities in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we estimate the lower limit on γ-ray Doppler factors for those γ-ray blazars following Mattox et al (1993) as did in Fan et al (2013aFan et al ( , 2014, probing their relations and shedding new light on the relativistic beaming effect of γ-ray loud blazars. The methodology is discussed in Section 2, while in Section 3 we describe the sample and results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we estimate the lower limit on γ-ray Doppler factors for those γ-ray blazars following Mattox et al (1993) as did in Fan et al (2013aFan et al ( , 2014, probing their relations and shedding new light on the relativistic beaming effect of γ-ray loud blazars. The methodology is discussed in Section 2, while in Section 3 we describe the sample and results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The variability timescales for most sources are unknown, even though a few ones are available (Yang & Fan 2010). In our calculation, for the sake of simplicity, we adopt T=1 d (Dondi & Ghisellini 1995;Ghisellini et al 1998;Fan et al 2013aFan et al , 2014. Consequently, we can calculate the lower limit on γ-ray Doppler factor δ γ .…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of γ-ray opacity Doppler factors is based on the requirement that the γ−ray emission region must be transparent to gamma rays (Mattox et al 1993;Fan et al 2013Fan et al , 2014. The process responsible for γ-ray absorption is pair production due to the interaction between γ-ray photons and X-ray photons.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Opacity Doppler Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the two subclasses is mainly that BL Lacertae objects show very weak (or even no) emission line features while FSRQs display strong emission lines. However, the continuum emission properties of BL Lacs and FSRQs are quite similar (Zhang & Fan 2003;Fan et al 2009Fan et al , 2014aXiao et al 2015). BL Lac objects were separately discovered through radio or X-ray surveys, and were divided into radio selected BL Lacertae objects (RBLs) and X-ray selected BL Lacertae objects (XBLs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Observations suggest that γ-ray loud blazars are variable on time scales of hours although there is no preferred scale for the variation time of any source (Fan et al 2014a). For example, Fermi LAT detected a variability time scale of ∼12 hour for PKS 1454 − 354 (Abdo et al 2009), and a doubling time of roughly 4 hours for PKS 1502+105 (Abdo et al 2010c).…”
Section: Short Variability Time Scale and Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%