2014
DOI: 10.1134/s0869593814050050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lower Jurassic of the Eastern Caspian region and the Middle Caspian Basin: Lithology, facies, taphonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their advanced reproductive capability probably allowed these plants to quickly adapt to new environmental challenges that led to the differences in the composition of these floras, whereas other deltaic or moist-environmentrelated plant groups, such as the spore-reproducing club mosses, horsetails and ferns account for the superficial similarity of these floras because of wide dispersive adaptive potential. A similar scenario of a fragmented palaeogeographic and rapidly changing environment in a small area during the end of the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic has been observed by Kiritchkova and Nosova (2014) in the Middle Caspian Basin, also hosting a flora dominated by similar bennettittalean taxa.…”
Section: Ecological Implicationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Their advanced reproductive capability probably allowed these plants to quickly adapt to new environmental challenges that led to the differences in the composition of these floras, whereas other deltaic or moist-environmentrelated plant groups, such as the spore-reproducing club mosses, horsetails and ferns account for the superficial similarity of these floras because of wide dispersive adaptive potential. A similar scenario of a fragmented palaeogeographic and rapidly changing environment in a small area during the end of the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic has been observed by Kiritchkova and Nosova (2014) in the Middle Caspian Basin, also hosting a flora dominated by similar bennettittalean taxa.…”
Section: Ecological Implicationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We summarized and analyzed geographical distributions of all 45 Jurassic species of Nilssoniopteris (including the current two new species) in the Supplementary Data Set and Figure 13. According to our analysis, during the Early Jurassic, 19 Nilssoniopteris species have been reported from Europe in Sweden (Florin, 1933b; Lundblad, 1950); Central Asia in Iran (Barnard, 1965; Schweitzer and Kirchner, 2003), Kazakhstan (Kiritchkova, 1973, 2000; Dolundenko and Orlovskaya, 1976), and the Caspian Basin (Kiritchkova and Nosova, 2012); and East Asia (China) in Inner Mongolia (Deng et al, 2017b) and Hubei Province (Sun and Yang, 1988). Among them, 14 species, the most abundant, are from Central Asia.
Figure 13Jurassic stratigraphic and geographical distribution of Nilssoniopteris (base maps are from Boucot et al, 2009): ( 1 ) one species; ( 2 ) two or three species; ( 3 ) four to five species; ( 4 ) more than six species.
…”
Section: Distribution Of the Jurassic Nilssoniopteris And Their Paleomentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The number of Middle Jurassic species increased to 27 with their geographic distribution also expanded. They were reported from Europe in Andøya, Norway (Manum et al, 1991), Yorkshire, England (Harris, 1969), and Peski locality, European Russia (Gordenko, 2008); Central Asia in many locations (Doludenko and Svanidze, 1969; Markovitch, 1971; Vassilevskaja et al, 1972; Gomolitzky, 1974; Barnard and Miller, 1976; Dolundenko and Orlovskaya, 1976; Kiritchkova and Nosova, 2012); and East Asia, mainly in North China, including Inner Mongolia, Hebei Province, Gansu Province, Shanxi Province, Henan Province, the Qaidam Basin of Qinghai Province, and Hami of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Zhang et al, 1976; Wang, 1984; Li et al, 1988; Sun and Shen, 1988; Barale et al, 1998; this paper).…”
Section: Distribution Of the Jurassic Nilssoniopteris And Their Paleomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a coarse-grained unit at the base of the stratum with a thickness of 40 to 70 m with the following reservoir properties; effective porosity up to 20%, permeability of 10×10 -3 µm 2 (Windley et al 2007;Al-Obaidi 2016). The overlying part of the section is composed of inequigranular tuff sandstones, tuff siltstones, and tuff mudstones (Kiritchkova & Nosova 2014).…”
Section: Upper Triassic Deposits (T3)mentioning
confidence: 99%