“…Miao et al [14] improve definitions of rough group and rough subgroup, and prove their new properties. On the other hand, Kuroki and Wang [11] presented some properties of the lower and upper approximations with respect to the normal subgroups in 1996. In addition, some properties of the lower and the upper approximations with respect to the normal subgroups were studied in [5,13,[26][27][28].…”
Abstract. In this paper, we introduced the notion of near subsemigroups, near ideals, near biideals and homomorphisms of near semigroups on near approximation spaces. Then we give some properties of these near structures.
“…Miao et al [14] improve definitions of rough group and rough subgroup, and prove their new properties. On the other hand, Kuroki and Wang [11] presented some properties of the lower and upper approximations with respect to the normal subgroups in 1996. In addition, some properties of the lower and the upper approximations with respect to the normal subgroups were studied in [5,13,[26][27][28].…”
Abstract. In this paper, we introduced the notion of near subsemigroups, near ideals, near biideals and homomorphisms of near semigroups on near approximation spaces. Then we give some properties of these near structures.
“…Yaqoob et al [1,2,17] presented some results on roughness in LA-semigroups, roughness in semigroups and roughness in Γ-AG-groupoids. Kuroki and Wang [8] gave some properties of the lower and upper approximations with respect to the normal subgroups. Also, Kuroki and Mordeson in [9] studied the structure of rough sets and rough groups.…”
Abstract.In this paper, we introduced the notion of rough left almost groups. We proved that the lower and the upper approximation of an LA-subgroup is an LA-subgroup.
“…Kuroki [16] introduced the notion of a rough ideal in a semigroup. Kuroki and Wang [17] gave some properties of the lower and upper approximations with respect to normal subgroups. Mordeson [24] used covers of the universal set to define approximations operators on the power set of given set.…”
Abstract. The initiation and majority on rough sets for algebraic hyperstructures such as hypermodules over a hyperring have been concentrated on a congruence relation. The congruence relation, however, seems to restrict the application of the generalized rough set model for algebraic sets. In this paper, in order to solve this problem, we consider the concept of set-valued homomorphism for hypermodules and we give some examples of set-valued homomorphism. In this respect, we show that every homomorphism of the hypermodules is a set-valued homomorphism. The notions of generalized lower and upper approximation operators, constructed by means of a set-valued mapping, which is a generalization of the notion of lower and upper approximations of a hypermodule, are provided. We also propose the notion of generalized lower and upper approximations with respect to a subhypermodule of a hypermodule discuss some significant properties of them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.