2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00015-006-1191-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The low-temperature thermal history of northern Switzerland as revealed by fission track analysis and inverse thermal modelling

Abstract: Low-temperature thermal history of N-Switzerland 255 ABSTRACT New zircon and apatite fission track (FT) data from four boreholes, which penetrate the Mesozoic and pre-Mesozoic sediments and crystalline basement of northern Switzerland, are presented. Inverse thermal modelling of the measured apatite FT parameters unravels the low-temperature (below ~120 °C) thermal history of the crystalline basement of northern Switzerland. Zircon FT central and single-grain ages cluster around 250 Ma, thus maximum palaeotemp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooling of the hydrothermal fluids that transport Zn either as Zn-Cl or Zn-H-S complexes was combined with a pH change towards more alkaline values due to interaction with the encasing carbonate rocks. Under the conditions experienced by the investigated limestone [maximal burial depth of 1,000 m and burial temperature of 70°C (Elie and Mazurek 2008;Mazurek et al 2006;Timar-Geng et al 2006)], these changes probably resulted in sphalerite precipitation (Daskalakis and Helz 1993;Tagirov et al 2007). Recent direct Rb-Sr dating of sphalerite crystals from the Auenstein section (JMR, Late Bajocian/Early Bathonian) yielded an age of 162 ± 4 Ma, corresponding to Late Callovian/Early Oxfordian, which confirms that formation of sphalerite probably occurred after sediment deposition (Efimenko et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cooling of the hydrothermal fluids that transport Zn either as Zn-Cl or Zn-H-S complexes was combined with a pH change towards more alkaline values due to interaction with the encasing carbonate rocks. Under the conditions experienced by the investigated limestone [maximal burial depth of 1,000 m and burial temperature of 70°C (Elie and Mazurek 2008;Mazurek et al 2006;Timar-Geng et al 2006)], these changes probably resulted in sphalerite precipitation (Daskalakis and Helz 1993;Tagirov et al 2007). Recent direct Rb-Sr dating of sphalerite crystals from the Auenstein section (JMR, Late Bajocian/Early Bathonian) yielded an age of 162 ± 4 Ma, corresponding to Late Callovian/Early Oxfordian, which confirms that formation of sphalerite probably occurred after sediment deposition (Efimenko et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low burial temperature (max. 70°C) experienced by these Jurassic limestone (Elie and Mazurek 2008;Mazurek et al 2006;Timar-Geng et al 2006) would also preclude the formation of hematite from goethite. In support, evidence for secondary sulfide oxidation caused by the infiltration of oxygenated surface waters and post-dating Zn mineralizations in the Muschelkalk of the Black forest has been inferred from sulfur isotope ratios (Hofmann and von Gehlen 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If so, the pre‐existing basement structures had a high potential to become reactivated (Brockkamp et al ., ). In fact, re‐activation during the Jurassic is evidenced by vein mineralization data and changes in lithofacies, as well as thickness changes across faults in the crystalline basement; in many instances, thickness anomalies exceed depositional water depth and, hence, imply synsedimentary differential tectonic movements (Wetzel et al ., ; Timar‐Geng et al ., ; Brockkamp et al ., ). However, the sediments were deformed mainly flexurally as vertical movements in the basement were dissipated by Triassic salt.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data from the stratigraphic record enable one to (i) define the original Several studies have been done to estimate the magnitude of the erosion in the study area. Several methods have been used such as analysis of vitrinite reflectance data (%Ro) [3][4][5][6], stratigraphic and porosity extrapolation [7]; subsidence analysis [8], clay mineral transformation [9], seismic interval analysis [7], and apatite fission tracks [6,[10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%