2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-013-9180-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approval is required when conducting any activity involving human research. The task of reviewing projects falls to Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) when the research has a greater than low level of risk; for some categories of research and in some institutions, this responsibility also extends to projects deemed to be low risk (Moore & Richardson, 2013). This puts a significant onus on each HREC to uphold high standards, sometimes leading to accusations that HRECs are overstepping their mark, making their level of control problematic (Israel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approval is required when conducting any activity involving human research. The task of reviewing projects falls to Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) when the research has a greater than low level of risk; for some categories of research and in some institutions, this responsibility also extends to projects deemed to be low risk (Moore & Richardson, 2013). This puts a significant onus on each HREC to uphold high standards, sometimes leading to accusations that HRECs are overstepping their mark, making their level of control problematic (Israel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%