2021
DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.621685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Low Opportunity Costs of the Amazon Soy Moratorium

Abstract: Brazil’s Amazon Soy Moratorium (ASM) contributed to overall reductions in Amazon deforestation since its implementation in 2006. Under the ASM, the Amazon soy sector maintains access to the growing share of the market that operates under zero-deforestation commitments. The ASM has been criticized as unfair to law-abiding producers. Only 1% of the approximately 14,000 soy farms in the Amazon Biome have soy-suitable, forested areas that could be deforested lawfully (49,273 ha). More than half of Amazon soy farms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the observed losses due to logistics and harvest, there are also emissions from deforestation and changes in land use present in all Brazilian biomes (Lima et al 2019 ; Rausch and Gibbs 2021 ). Regardless of the reductions in deforestation observed in the Amazon biome (as a result of the measures in a soy moratorium), biomes such as the Cerrado are vulnerable to Brazilian soybean expansion (Rausch et al 2019 ; Heilmayr et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the observed losses due to logistics and harvest, there are also emissions from deforestation and changes in land use present in all Brazilian biomes (Lima et al 2019 ; Rausch and Gibbs 2021 ). Regardless of the reductions in deforestation observed in the Amazon biome (as a result of the measures in a soy moratorium), biomes such as the Cerrado are vulnerable to Brazilian soybean expansion (Rausch et al 2019 ; Heilmayr et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that had companies with an adopted ZDC in the Cerrado implemented their commitments with the same effectiveness as the SoyM, they could have halved observed soy-deforestation in the biome between 2006 and 2015. This estimate assumes that the implementation of ZDCs in the Cerrado would have had the same effect on soy-deforestation as the SoyM, a strong assumption given that the SoyM is supported among more companies, restricted to a comparably small area (Rausch and Gibbs 2021), and located in a region with stricter environmental laws (NVP 2012), providing synergies in monitoring and enforcement of the commitment (Lambin et al 2014, Garrett et al 2019. At the same time, the Cerrado faced high pressure for soy expansion, possibly in part due to displaced demand from the Amazon because of SoyM implementation (Noojipady et al 2017, Rausch et al 2019.…”
Section: Implementation Of Current Zdcs In the Cerrado May Conserve L...mentioning
confidence: 99%