2006
DOI: 10.1086/500500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Low‐Mass Initial Mass Function of the Field Population in the Large Magellanic Cloud withHubble Space TelescopeWFPC2 Observations

Abstract: We present V-and I-equivalent HST WFPC2 stellar photometry of an area in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), located to the west of the bar of the galaxy, which accounts for the general background field of its inner disk. The WFPC2 observations reach magnitudes as faint as V ¼ 25 mag, and the large sample of more than 80,000 stars allows us to determine in detail the present-day mass function ( PDMF) of the detected main-sequence stars, which is identical to the initial mass function ( IMF) for masses M P 1 M . … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(220 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the IMF slopes for clusters in the LMC are close to the Salpeter value seen in the MW (e.g., Massey 2003), the IMF derived from the measured current mass function of LMC field stars, a measure of the IGIMF, shows steep slopes, Γ ∼ −4, above 1 M (Gouliermis et al 2006;Massey et al 1995a), consistent with a top-light IGIMF. A caveat is that measured mass functions for field stars more massive than ∼1 M require corrections to account for evolved stars and past star formation, in order to estimate the IMF.…”
Section: The Chemical Evolution Of Sgrmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…While the IMF slopes for clusters in the LMC are close to the Salpeter value seen in the MW (e.g., Massey 2003), the IMF derived from the measured current mass function of LMC field stars, a measure of the IGIMF, shows steep slopes, Γ ∼ −4, above 1 M (Gouliermis et al 2006;Massey et al 1995a), consistent with a top-light IGIMF. A caveat is that measured mass functions for field stars more massive than ∼1 M require corrections to account for evolved stars and past star formation, in order to estimate the IMF.…”
Section: The Chemical Evolution Of Sgrmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This led him to conclude that the IMF was environment dependent, in particular varying with density. Similarly steep mass functions have been derived by Gouliermis, Brandner & Henning (2006) using HST WFPC2 data of a field near the bar of the LMC. Parker et al (1998) used the Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope to derive the IMF of the LMC field and also found a steeper distribution (although not as extreme as the above studies) of Γ = 1.8± 0.09 for the mass range of 7− 35 M ⊙ .…”
Section: The Large and Small Magellanic Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is worth recalling that these parametrizations are based on the analyses carried out within our Galaxy. Robust results from the analyses carried out within the LMC itself are still missing, in particular for stars with mass below 0.4 M ⊙ (in fact the most interesting mass range for our purposes) even if a few first analyses show roughly consistent, although somewhat steeper, behaviours (Gouliermis, Brandner & Henning 2006; Da Rio, Gouliermis & Henning 2009).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%