SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3628192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The low frequency output of marine air‐gun arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that ultralow frequency amplitude and phase control would be impossible in seismic processing and/or inversion. Hegna and Parkes (2011) also demonstrate that the bubble oscillation period gets shorter with increasing hydrostatic pressure and, hence, increasing tow depth. For a particular gun volume and pressure, therefore, the power of the signals in the ultra-low frequency end emitted by an air-gun decrease with increasing tow depth.…”
Section: Fighting the Inescapable Laws Of Physicsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means that ultralow frequency amplitude and phase control would be impossible in seismic processing and/or inversion. Hegna and Parkes (2011) also demonstrate that the bubble oscillation period gets shorter with increasing hydrostatic pressure and, hence, increasing tow depth. For a particular gun volume and pressure, therefore, the power of the signals in the ultra-low frequency end emitted by an air-gun decrease with increasing tow depth.…”
Section: Fighting the Inescapable Laws Of Physicsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Removal of either/both the source-side and receiver-side ghost effects will evidently allow the recovery of ultra-low frequency amplitudes penalised by ghosting. Parkes and Hegna (2011) and Hegna and Parkes (2012) describe a solution to complete ghost removal that is AVA/AVO-compliant (amplitude vs angle or offset), and phasecompliant for all scenarios of interest to seismic inversion and quantitative interpretation (discussed later). Figure 5 illustrates the ultra-low frequency benefits to seismic images after complete ghost removal.…”
Section: Unwanted Reflections From the Free-surface Of The Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The severity of these notches and depressions depends on the free-surface reflection coefficient for the ghost notches and the primary to bubble ratio for the bubble related notches, respectively. The low-frequency output from an air-gun array is almost unaffected by the source depth (Hegna and Parkes, 2011;Hopperstad et al, 2012;Landrø and Amundsen, 2014). There are two major effects related to the depth of the source that influences the low-frequency output from an air gun.…”
Section: Theory Notches In the Air-gun Spectrummentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The low-frequency response from an air-gun array is only weakly dependent on the source depth. If we position the source deeper, it will result in a source ghost response more favorable for the low frequencies, but the corresponding reduction in the bubble time period yields less low-frequency output (Hegna and Parkes, 2011;Hopperstad et al, 2012;Landrø and Amundsen, 2014). However, the main effect and goal of this acquisition strategy is to obtain diversity of the notches related to the ghost and notches or depressions caused by the bubble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%