2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab80c0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Low Effective Spin of Binary Black Holes and Implications for Individual Gravitational-wave Events

Abstract: While the Advanced LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave (GW) experiments now regularly observe binary black hole (BBH) mergers, the evolutionary origin of these events remains a mystery. Analysis of the BBH spin distribution may shed light on this mystery, offering a means of discriminating between different binary formation channels. Using the data from Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s first and second observing runs, here we seek to carefully characterize the distribution of effective spin … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
81
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
11
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability that GW170729 is of hierarchical origin (either 1G+2G or 2G+2G) is 4%. GW151226, which has the most confidently measured non-zero spin (Abbott et al 2016d(Abbott et al , 2019aMiller et al 2020)-we find that = c Z Z log 6.5…”
Section: Odds Ratios For the Hierarchical Merger Scenariomentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The probability that GW170729 is of hierarchical origin (either 1G+2G or 2G+2G) is 4%. GW151226, which has the most confidently measured non-zero spin (Abbott et al 2016d(Abbott et al , 2019aMiller et al 2020)-we find that = c Z Z log 6.5…”
Section: Odds Ratios For the Hierarchical Merger Scenariomentioning
confidence: 75%
“…They are chosen to be consistent with GW190814 [2], in particular the source frame chirp mass M c = (m 1 m 2 ) 3/5 /(m 1 + m 2 ) 1/5 and the inclination. Consistent with the majority of observed signals to date [4], we only consider binaries with a vanishing inspiral spin χ eff [128][129][130]. We do not expect this particular choice to affect our results due to the approximate decoupling between the inspiral and precession dynamics [119,131].…”
Section: Simulated Gravitational-wave Signalsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, inferred spins are more sensitive than other parameters (e.g., component masses) to the choice of the prior. A reanalysis of GW events with a population-informed spin prior recently suggested that previous binary component spin measurements may have been overestimated because of the use of an uninformative prior [137]. Collecting more observations will enable us to make more confident statements on BH spins in the future.…”
Section: Orientation and Spinsmentioning
confidence: 99%