2014
DOI: 10.1186/s40494-014-0017-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Louvre Crucifix by Giotto – Unveiling the original decoration by 2D-XRF, X-ray radiography, Emissiography and SEM-EDX analysis

Abstract: Introduction: Giotto (1266-1337) and his workshop realized c. 1315 the large Crucifix now in the Louvre Museum. The conservation of this masterpiece in 2010-2013 in the C2RMF studios gave the opportunity for a comprehensive investigation of the execution technique through a characterization of the paint layers. The first examinations revealed an original gilding and decoration surrounding the Christ which was repainted during the 19 th C., raising the question of the original decoration appearance. Results: Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of modern gold leaves SEM-BSE and RBS measurements further show that the Poliergold (96±9; 92±7 nm) appears slightly thinner than the Doppelgold (116±16 nm; 127±7 nm) by ca. 20-30 nm, but both of them are still within the published thickness range of 100-200 nm for modern gold leaf [21,22]. The high consistency between SEM-EDX and RBS measurements of modern gold leaf samples proves that the samples were precisely prepared, which further confirms the accuracy and reliability of the SEM-EDX observations on the medieval gold leaf samples.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques and Experimental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the case of modern gold leaves SEM-BSE and RBS measurements further show that the Poliergold (96±9; 92±7 nm) appears slightly thinner than the Doppelgold (116±16 nm; 127±7 nm) by ca. 20-30 nm, but both of them are still within the published thickness range of 100-200 nm for modern gold leaf [21,22]. The high consistency between SEM-EDX and RBS measurements of modern gold leaf samples proves that the samples were precisely prepared, which further confirms the accuracy and reliability of the SEM-EDX observations on the medieval gold leaf samples.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques and Experimental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…SEM-BSE and RBS measurements further show that the Poliergold (96±9; 92±7 nm) appears slightly thinner than the Doppelgold (116±16 nm; 127±7 nm) by ca. 20-30 nm, but both of them are still within the published thickness range of 100-200 nm for modern gold leaf [20,21]. The high consistency between SEM-EDX and RBS measurements of modern gold leaf samples proves that the samples were precisely prepared, which further con rms the accuracy and reliability of the SEM-EDX observations on the medieval gold leaf samples.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques and Experimental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…SEM-BSE and RBS measurements further show that the Poliergold (96±9; 92±7 nm) appears slightly thinner than the Doppelgold (116±16 nm; 127±7 nm) by ca. 20-30 nm, but both of them are still within the published thickness range of 100-200 nm for modern gold leaf [21,22]. The high consistency between SEM-EDX and RBS measurements of modern gold leaf samples proves that the samples were precisely prepared, which further con rms the accuracy and reliability of the SEM-EDX observations on the medieval gold leaf samples.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques and Experimental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 61%