2020
DOI: 10.1177/0253717620952313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Loss of the Shared Space: Process Issues in Telepsychotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee ( 2010 ) noticed that non-verbal interactions enable psychologists and patients to integrate better what is being discussed in the session and effectively convey feelings such as empathy and understanding. However, with telepsychology, some non-verbal interactions may not be accessible to the psychologist or the patient (Kashyap et al 2020 ; Lee 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee ( 2010 ) noticed that non-verbal interactions enable psychologists and patients to integrate better what is being discussed in the session and effectively convey feelings such as empathy and understanding. However, with telepsychology, some non-verbal interactions may not be accessible to the psychologist or the patient (Kashyap et al 2020 ; Lee 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telepsychology introduces significant changes to the traditional therapy process, primarily regarding the potential loss of non-verbal cues (Kashyap, Chandur & Reddy 2020 ). Non-verbal cues enable effective communication, foster empathy and promote understanding during psychotherapy sessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the important functions of providing a “safe place” and “holding environment” served by the therapist’s office in traditional in-person therapy are often missing in the virtual world of OPT. 12 , 14 …”
Section: Constraints Related To Internet or Digital Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was primarily because of concerns around symptom interference with online engagement and the inadequate safety and response mechanisms for emergencies (Sousa et al, 2020). Current guidelines offer little support to therapists in the negotiation of distance and closeness in their online work with clients who have attachment vulnerabilities – this dynamic manifests differently and can seem accentuated in the digital therapy room (Kashyap et al, 2020). While concerns about client selection were prominent in the first year of the pandemic, there are emerging indications that, despite some challenges, even clients with severe and complex presentations can be engaged safely and effectively in online psychotherapy (Dharwadkar et al, 2022; Miu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Case Study 1 – Bangalore Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%