The longue durée of community engagement: New applications of critical theory in planning research

Abstract

Habermas" critical theory, and particularly his theory of communicative action, has been applied in the theory and practice of communicative planning. The concept of creating a public sphere in planning processes has been used as an "ought" that planners should seek to achieve to create a communicative rationality. Accepting some of the critique of communicative planning from an agonist and Foucauldian perspective, this paper presents a new application of Habermas" critical theory. Evidence is presented from community activists in two neighbourhoods of their ongoing reflection on the changes to their built environment over 20 years of regeneration. In this context, Habermas" theoretical work does explain the long-term discourse as the community moved towards a shared consensus on their neighbourhood. This is used to suggest that instead of looking for consensus in the tense conflicting of moments of initial engagement planners we should focus on the longue durée, and the Lifeworld of lived experience, where shared subjectivities over the built environment can develop.

Framing People and Planning: 50 Years of Debate

“…para 7]) and called for a new type of active citizen ('participation offers the opportunity of serving the community' [ibid]). Table 1 around here. So Skeffington put participation in planning on the map but it can also be argued that it marked the start of its 'long crisis' (Matthews, 2013). The turn towards participation drew on several different contemporary concerns and strands of planning thought (Damer and Hague, 1971;Thornley, 1977;Huxley, 2013, see also Shapley (2014 for an overview of the Committee and its report).…”

Neo-advocacy for neo-liberal times: Planning Aid and the Advocacy Project in England

“…The neologism also reflects a recognition that support for a renewed advocacy is needed just as much now, if not more, than in the conditions of the 1960s. As part of the argument for such a model, the paper contributes to the debate about where Planning Aid The literature discussing advocacy, 'equity' and empowerment planning models (Krumholz and Forester, 1990;Krumholz, 1982;Peattie, 1978) has been largely hortatory and belies much of what we know about the difficulties in realising progressive planning forms and outcomes (see Matthews, 2013;Rydin, 2013). The focus has rested on the theory, design, technique and process (Sandercock, 1998), rather than the conditions necessary for success.…”

“…Efforts to pluralise planning practice, to redress issues of exclusion and widen access to planning have involved a long-running search for ways to 'emancipate communities' (MacDonald, 2014;Matthews, 2013). Progress in extending participation in planning to those ends has been limited and while there are many examples of ideas and tools in circulation geared to enable participation (e.g.…”

On Time and Planning: Opening Futures by Cultivating a “Sense of Now”

“…1 We don’t fully understand (or research or teach) how time is constructed or interpreted, how its meanings are shaped, or how it is marked in space. Despite the discipline’s intrinsic interest in shaping future states, most approaches to planning research are time bounded (e.g., cross-sectional studies), often failing to capture long-term impacts of planning episodes (Hall 2013; Matthews 2013).…”