1986
DOI: 10.1086/114280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The longitude discrepancy for mutual satellite phenomena resolved

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-8. (C-O) of the observation in seconds of time; these quantities take into account a phase effect by means of the Aksnes et al (1986) method; 9. aperture of the telescope in centimeters (T = reflector; L= refractor); 10. code of the used receptor in column "Recept." (cf.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-8. (C-O) of the observation in seconds of time; these quantities take into account a phase effect by means of the Aksnes et al (1986) method; 9. aperture of the telescope in centimeters (T = reflector; L= refractor); 10. code of the used receptor in column "Recept." (cf.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-8. (C-O) of the observation in seconds of time; these quantities take into account the phase effect (Aksnes et al 1986); 9. Aperture of the telescope in centimeters (T = reflector; L = refractor); 10.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This time shift and the impact parameter were derived as free parameters in the least square fit. The model also takes into account the intensity variation on the surface of the satellite due to phase effects (Aksnes et al 1986). The fitted time shift is a direct measure of the delay/advance in longitude at the time of geometric conjunction and accounts for the phase effects in case of fits using E5 and E3.…”
Section: Fit To the 1997 Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%