2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-018-0597-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Longest Processing Time rule for identical parallel machines revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Della Croce and Scatamacchia [6] revisit LPT to propose yet another heuristic, SLACK, by splitting the sorted tasks in tuples of m consecutive tasks (recall that m is the number of processors), and then sorting tuples by non-increasing order of the difference between the largest and smallest task in the tuple. A list-scheduling strategy is then applied with tasks sorted in this order.…”
Section: Beyond Lptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Della Croce and Scatamacchia [6] revisit LPT to propose yet another heuristic, SLACK, by splitting the sorted tasks in tuples of m consecutive tasks (recall that m is the number of processors), and then sorting tuples by non-increasing order of the difference between the largest and smallest task in the tuple. A list-scheduling strategy is then applied with tasks sorted in this order.…”
Section: Beyond Lptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an evaluation of SLACK is done in [6]: this variant of LPT turns out to be much better than LPT on benchmark literature instances, and it remains competitive with the COMBINE heuristic that is more costly and more difficult to implement.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inclusion of the LPT heuristic allows placing the shorter jobs (or items) more towards the end of the schedule (or packing process), where they can be used for balancing the loads [12]. The presorting algorithms provide better worst-case performance than the classical online ones [20,21,23,75]. On the other hand, the time complexity of the presorting algorithms is O (n log n) while that of the classical BP algorithms NF, FF, WF and BF is O (n).…”
Section: ) the Bin-packing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, scheduling daily inspections can be thought of as a Pm‖Cmax scheduling problem [12] where inspection of n firms is to be carried out in parallel by m identical or parallel inspectors (Pm) with maximum work capacity (Cmax) to minimize the time to complete the inspection. One of the earliest algorithms for solving such scheduling problem is the Longest Processing Time (LPT) rule which requires sorting the jobs (or firms) in nonascending order of their processing times and then to assign one job at a time to the machine (or inspector) whose load is smallest until all the jobs are completed [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%