2003
DOI: 10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n1.a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-time dynamics of Dirac particles in the Kerr-Newman black hole geometry

Abstract: We consider the Cauchy problem for the massive Dirac equation in the non-extreme Kerr-Newman geometry outside the event horizon. We derive an integral representation for the Dirac propagator involving the solutions of the ODEs which arise in Chandrasekhar's separation of variables. It is proved that for initial data in L ∞ loc near the event horizon with L 2 decay at infinity, the probability of the Dirac particle to be in any compact region of space tends to zero as t goes to infinity. This means that the Dir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
149
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This turns out to be useful also for the analysis of qualitative spectral properties ofĤ. It is worth mentioning that the aforementioned problem associated with variable separation in Chandrasekhar ansatz and the occurrence of two Hilbert spaces in the analysis of the Dirac equation have been already pointed out in [9] for the case of the Dirac equation on a black hole background of the Kerr-Newman family, which has been considered in several studies [10,11,12,13,14,15] (see also [16]); the above part of our analysis can be of interest also for that case. Moreover, our analysis points out some relevant differences to be related to the AdS background considered herein, and also introduces some interesting analysis to be associated with a magnetically charged black hole: we find the Dirac charge quantization as a condition ensuring essential selfadjointness for the Hamiltonian operatorĤ on C ∞ 0 ((r + , ∞) × S 2 ) 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This turns out to be useful also for the analysis of qualitative spectral properties ofĤ. It is worth mentioning that the aforementioned problem associated with variable separation in Chandrasekhar ansatz and the occurrence of two Hilbert spaces in the analysis of the Dirac equation have been already pointed out in [9] for the case of the Dirac equation on a black hole background of the Kerr-Newman family, which has been considered in several studies [10,11,12,13,14,15] (see also [16]); the above part of our analysis can be of interest also for that case. Moreover, our analysis points out some relevant differences to be related to the AdS background considered herein, and also introduces some interesting analysis to be associated with a magnetically charged black hole: we find the Dirac charge quantization as a condition ensuring essential selfadjointness for the Hamiltonian operatorĤ on C ∞ 0 ((r + , ∞) × S 2 ) 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We do it as follows. If we foliate spacetime in t = constant slices S t , the metric on any slice (considering the shift vectors) is 8) where α = 1, 2, 3 and 9) and local measure…”
Section: The Kerr-newman-ads Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact remains true even when as in [8] we consider the system in a "finite box," i.e. when the range of the radial variable r is restricted to a bounded interval r ∈ [r L , r R ] with r 1 < r L < r R < ∞.…”
Section: Spectral Properties Of the Hamiltonian In A Finite Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we turn our attention to the scalar wave equation in the Kerr geometry. Our main result is to derive an integral representation for the propagator, similar to the one obtained for the Dirac equation in [8]. In our next paper [9], we will use this integral representation to analyze the long-time dynamics and the decay of solutions in L ∞ loc .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [10] inferred the completeness of this ansatz from the aforementioned integral representation. An alternative proof of the completeness of the Chandrasekhar ansatz can also be found in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%