2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-term stability of survey monuments in permafrost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal concern using geodetic positioning of monuments in permafrost is the potential for monument instability due to frost heave (Tait et al 2005). Various designs of "antiheave" benchmarks have been devised in the past, but we believe the key to monument stability is length (depth of burial), to ensure that frost heave is inhibited by a greater length of wall bonding at depth.…”
Section: Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal concern using geodetic positioning of monuments in permafrost is the potential for monument instability due to frost heave (Tait et al 2005). Various designs of "antiheave" benchmarks have been devised in the past, but we believe the key to monument stability is length (depth of burial), to ensure that frost heave is inhibited by a greater length of wall bonding at depth.…”
Section: Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, oil and gas exploration and potential resource development in the Mackenzie delta area pose important hydroecological and geotechnical questions (Tait et al 2005;Gharabaghi et al 2007;Lesack and Marsh 2007;Inkratas et al 2009;Beltaos et al 2011a). Dealing with such questions depends on good hydrologic data, and especially on flow discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%