2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00579-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-term effects of laser photocoagulation treatment in patients with diabetic retinopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
4
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
71
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the ETDRS, the median cholesterol value when compared with the age-stratified distribution of the patients screened by the Lipids Research Clinics Program was at the 75th percentile, compared with approximately the 50th percentile in the DCCT (26). More specifically, ETDRS participants' total cholesterol ranged from 106 to 852 mg/dl, with the mean of 229 mg/dl (27), compared with total cholesterol ranging from 73 to 312 mg/dl, with a mean of 176 mg/dl in the DCCT. Additionally, in the ETDRS, 36% of participants had total cholesterol levels Ͼ240 mg/dl compared with Ͻ5% in DCCT subjects (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, in the ETDRS, the median cholesterol value when compared with the age-stratified distribution of the patients screened by the Lipids Research Clinics Program was at the 75th percentile, compared with approximately the 50th percentile in the DCCT (26). More specifically, ETDRS participants' total cholesterol ranged from 106 to 852 mg/dl, with the mean of 229 mg/dl (27), compared with total cholesterol ranging from 73 to 312 mg/dl, with a mean of 176 mg/dl in the DCCT. Additionally, in the ETDRS, 36% of participants had total cholesterol levels Ͼ240 mg/dl compared with Ͻ5% in DCCT subjects (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10 Since the ETDRS, focal and grid laser treatment have been the standard treatment for MO. A long-term follow-up study by Chew et al 11 found that a median of 16.7 years after the original study, 42% of patients had a visual acuity of 20/20 [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log-MAR) 0] or better in their best eye, and 84% had a visual acuity of 20/40 (log-MAR 0.3) or better in their best eye. Nevertheless, laser treatment is not without risk and is not effective in all cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This treatment approach has been proven effective in large randomized clinical trials at inducing long-term regression of neovascularization; however, such treatment can be associated with potentially vision threatening side-effects and a proportion of patients still continue to develop active neovascularization and consequent visual loss (Chew et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%