2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijoem-02-2017-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long run performance of secondary equity offerings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

Abstract: Purpose Opinions have been divided on whether there is a rational explanation to the reason behind seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) or whether the explanation lies within the behavioural intricacies attributed to stock market participants. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates the long-run performance of firms conducting SEOs on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over the period of 1998–2015, by examining the return performance and operating performanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another unfavorable consequence determined in the literature is the underperformance of firms regarding the long-term post-SEO performance (Da Cunha and Seetharam 2018;Hsu et al 2016;Wadhwa and Syamala 2018;Yang et al 2013). Dasilas and Leventis (2013) stated that firms that announce an SEO will underperform for two years following the announcement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another unfavorable consequence determined in the literature is the underperformance of firms regarding the long-term post-SEO performance (Da Cunha and Seetharam 2018;Hsu et al 2016;Wadhwa and Syamala 2018;Yang et al 2013). Dasilas and Leventis (2013) stated that firms that announce an SEO will underperform for two years following the announcement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kunjal et al, 2021) and stock markets (e.g. da Cunha and Seetharam, 2018). Some performance studies have also been conducted on insurance firms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%