2021
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/e8k7p
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long-Run Effect of Public Libraries on Children: Evidence from the Early 1900s

Abstract: Between 1890 and 1921, Andrew Carnegie funded the construction of 1,618 public libraries in cities and towns across the United States. I link these library construction grants to census data and measure the effect of childhood public library access on adult outcomes. Library construction grants increased children's educational attainment by 0.10 years, did not affect wage income, and increased non-wage income by 4%. These income effects are driven by occupational choice. Access to a public library caused child… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are less precisely estimated than our baseline results; SEDA does not report test scores in districts when there is an insu cient number of observations to construct their test score measures and many districts have only a small number of students of a given race, leading to more year-to-year variability in the test scores of small groups. 29 The results in Figure 6 suggest that our ndings are mainly driven by positive e ects on the reading test scores of white and Hispanic students. However, the standard errors shown in these gures are large enough that we cannot rule out sizable, positive e ects for all groups.…”
Section: Reading Results Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These results are less precisely estimated than our baseline results; SEDA does not report test scores in districts when there is an insu cient number of observations to construct their test score measures and many districts have only a small number of students of a given race, leading to more year-to-year variability in the test scores of small groups. 29 The results in Figure 6 suggest that our ndings are mainly driven by positive e ects on the reading test scores of white and Hispanic students. However, the standard errors shown in these gures are large enough that we cannot rule out sizable, positive e ects for all groups.…”
Section: Reading Results Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 76%