To the Editor We commend the recent Viewpoint by Moore et al. 1 The authors' proposed framework, if implemented widely, could transition a historically inflexible environment for pregnant female trainees toward a more supportive, healthier culture. However, as Rangel, one of the coauthors, has herself published, women may experience challenges with infertility and early miscarriages prior to when they would even be comfortable disclosing a pregnancy. 2 Additionally, any attempt to broaden acceptance of family growth in residency should also include those who pursue other avenues including but not limited to adoption and surrogacy. Thus, the authors' schematic for their mentorship program should go a step further in sharing relevant information and resources prior to and irrespective of trainee disclosure of a new pregnancy.Research has shown that women in procedural specialties, in particular, are more likely to delay pregnancy intentionally or have difficulty conceiving even with the use of assisted reproduction. 3 This may be in part due to not having earlier access to information regarding logistics, cost, and other realities of family planning, oocyte cryopreservation, fertility issues, and more. Furthermore, many women are likely still discouraged from growing their family during training due to concerns of the potential impact on their careers or relationships with their peers. 4 Ensuring that all trainees are educated and supported in options and resources for family planning during their training may allow for a less reactionary approach to parental leave and improved awareness of the challenges of having a family during training, even for those who choose not to grow their family at that time but are willing to support their co-trainees in doing so.Finally, a mentorship schematic reliant on faculty who are in the minority, that is, those who grew their family in training, adds further burden and strain to a group that is already at the limits of their time capacity. While mentorship activities can be personally satisfying, the opportunity cost and socalled minority tax can negatively impact one's career advancement. 5 Programs may consider providing professional recognition and protecting time for residents and faculty involved in such a program, but work remains to identify how to better support and sustain these types of initiatives.