The long read: On the global relevance of the US elections

Rizvi, Fazal; Peters, Michael A.; Zembylas, Michalinos; Tukdeo, Shivali; Mason, Mark; Souza, Lynn Mário T. Menezes de; Wang, Chengbing; Soudien, Crain; Lingard, Bob; Tarc, Paul; Tarc, Aparna Mishra; Hughes, Conrad; Bamberger, Annette; Zipin, Lew; Rud, A. G.

doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1824784

Educational Philosophy and Theory

2020

DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1824784

|View full text |Cite

The long read: On the global relevance of the US elections

Fazal Rizvi

Michael A. Peters

Michalinos Zembylas

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some even call this abnormal (Klassen, 2021). Trump's leadership has also been characterized by political instability, racism-related violence, and the rise of rightwing and national populism (Rizvi et al, 2020). He will also be remembered as the U.S. President who built a 'politics of lies.'…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Sahide,

Misran,

Maksum

2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presidential election of the United States has always captured the world's attention. This is because America is a superpower in the global political arena. Therefore, the figure who is elected to occupy the White House has always impacted the global political scene for four years. Donald Trump, President of America 2017-2021, has had a tremendous impact on the global political scene with some controversial policies. Trump protectionism policies triggered the trade war between America and China, greatly impacting the global economy. This article looks at the sentiment of national media framing in Indonesia (Kompas, The Jakarta Post, and Republika) against the Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to Joe Biden. In this research, the writer reads news related to the presidential election of the U.S. from September 2020 to November 2020 from the three national media outlets in Indonesia to see the framing. In this framing analysis, we wanted to determine whether the framing was positive, negative, or neutral when making news about Trump's figure. The results of this study indicate that the highest percentage of mainstream media framing in Indonesia is negative. Trump has been widely reported to have negative sentiment toward the media in Indonesia. News outlets with positive sentiment are the lowest against Trump. This means that the national media in Indonesia also does not like Trump's controversial leadership style.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Sahide,

Misran,

Maksum

2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The US presidential election that influenced media around the world (Rizvi et al, 2022) has reflected how powerful corporations monopolized the news in the digital realm. This phenomenon prompted Anya Schiffrin (2017) to encourage public discussion and action in a book on “media capture.” She connects the roles of money, digital platforms, and governments in the issues of controlling digital journalism in the digital age.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Book Reviews: Media Capture: How Money, Digital Platforms, and Governments Control the News

Musa

Kasiyarno

Audah

2023

New Media & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis, from the Bloomsbury Series of Research Methods in Linguistics, is edited by Professor Camilla Vásquez and brings together the work of multiple experienced scholars who share expertise in discourse analysis but from different national backgrounds. Collectively, their work presents the readers with a breadth of platforms (e.g. YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit) and topics (e.g. political discourse, business communication, video tutorials, dating profiles, blogs) as well as research designs (e.g. ethnography, mixed methods) and approaches to discourse analysis (e.g. conversation analysis, narrative analysis, critical discourse analysis). (p. 4)

show abstract

Curriculum for living structural crises towards socially just futures: bringing diverse funds of knowledge into participatory-democratic action around lifeworld problems that matter

Zipin

2024

Curric Perspect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As crises unsettle lives across the globe, growing numbers of people, in diverse situations, encounter social and planetary futures in peril. Harder to grasp is how historical structures of unequal power underpin those perils. Building capacities to comprehend the lived effects of structural injustices, and proact to transform them, are ethical challenges for schooling, which this paper takes up. I initially focus not on school curriculum but ‘populist curriculum’: ideological messages that issue from power-forces and spread across societies. I draw conceptually on Antonio Gramsci to diagnose how, in current times, populist messages verge Extreme-Right as a hegemonically powerful minority wages culture wars that target marginalised groups to blame for ‘good-citizen’ sufferings. Such unjustly divisive efforts to hold power manifest a crisis of governance in chaos, I argue, symptomizing how structural underpinnings are at historic tipping points towards dangerous times ahead. Against the mis-educational tide of populist curriculum, I consider how school curriculum can build young people’s knowledge and agency to live present-day crises towards sustainable and socially-just futures. Taking conceptual tools from Paolo Freire, Lauren Berlant, and the Funds of Knowledge (FoK) approach pioneered by Luis Moll and colleagues, I draw on a school FoK project I was part of, that suggested possibilities for participatory-democratic curriculum activity, but limited by system constraints. I then conceptualise ways to expand beyond the constraints through what I call a Problems That Matter approach, featuring collaboration among students, community people, teachers and academics in student-led action-research on lived problems in their communities.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The long read: On the global relevance of the US elections

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Book Reviews: Media Capture: How Money, Digital Platforms, and Governments Control the News

Curriculum for living structural crises towards socially just futures: bringing diverse funds of knowledge into participatory-democratic action around lifeworld problems that matter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About