1994
DOI: 10.2307/2166162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long Goodbye: Dutch Capitalism and Antislavery in Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dutch also introduced enslavement to the British colonies, which now constitute the United States, when they delivered twenty enslaved Africans to the colony of Virginia in 1619. Unlike in the U.S. and the U.K., in The Netherlands, while a few individuals, particularly clergy, opposed enslavement, widespread abolitionism and abolitionist movements were largely absent (Drescher 1994 ;Emmer 1972 ). Unlike in the U.S. and the U.K., in The Netherlands, while a few individuals, particularly clergy, opposed enslavement, widespread abolitionism and abolitionist movements were largely absent (Drescher 1994 ;Emmer 1972 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Dutch also introduced enslavement to the British colonies, which now constitute the United States, when they delivered twenty enslaved Africans to the colony of Virginia in 1619. Unlike in the U.S. and the U.K., in The Netherlands, while a few individuals, particularly clergy, opposed enslavement, widespread abolitionism and abolitionist movements were largely absent (Drescher 1994 ;Emmer 1972 ). Unlike in the U.S. and the U.K., in The Netherlands, while a few individuals, particularly clergy, opposed enslavement, widespread abolitionism and abolitionist movements were largely absent (Drescher 1994 ;Emmer 1972 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dutch continued trading in enslaved men, women, and children even after it was outlawed in 1814 by acting as middlemen with Spain (Postma 1972 ). The Dutch legally abolished slavery in 1863, one of the last European powers to do so, but then required a 10-year "apprenticeship" (Drescher 1994 ;Oostindie 2005 ), which Whites paternalistically argued was necessary for the enslaved to understand the meaning and responsibilities of their freedom and determine how much former master enslavers should be compensated (Nimako and Willemsen 2011 ). The Dutch legally abolished slavery in 1863, one of the last European powers to do so, but then required a 10-year "apprenticeship" (Drescher 1994 ;Oostindie 2005 ), which Whites paternalistically argued was necessary for the enslaved to understand the meaning and responsibilities of their freedom and determine how much former master enslavers should be compensated (Nimako and Willemsen 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of abolition, the Surinamese plantations were still profijitable and the Netherlands slow to industrialise, which precludes any causal link between capitalism and anti-slavery according to Semour Drescher's essay The Long Goodbye and to various contributions in the volume Fifty Years Later that appeared under the editorship of Oostindie in 1995. 75 By the late 1990s, Henk den Heijer's Goud, ivoor en slaven ( Gold, ivory and slaves ), George Welling's The Prize of Neutrality and Wim Klooster's Illicit Riches , had made a convincing claim that in the eighteenth century, Suriname and Dutch Antilles played a far more prominent role in the commodity trade than hitherto assumed and that together with the trade in Africa, this would approximate to the value of the trade with Asia at that time. 76 Moreover, apart from the WIC trade in slaves, private Dutch slave trade was extensive until the early nineteenth century.…”
Section: Increasing Recognition Of the Importance Of The Atlantic Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Dutch were the last European imperial powers to abolish slavery (in 1863), some thirty years after the British. 69 Even the British forces would not have been able to launch the mission of abolishing slavery successfully, if they had not gained power over the entire island in 1815, wiping out the local government. The emergence of strong anti-slavery societies in Europe and, probably, the low profit margins of sugar plantations that used extensive slave labour, 70 as was the case in the other colonial territories, may have pressurized the British officers to embark on abolishing slavery from its colonies.…”
Section: Abolition Of Slaverymentioning
confidence: 99%