2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-009-9118-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The London Agreement and the cost of patenting in Europe

Abstract: This paper analyses the consequences for the European Patent System (EPS) of the recently ratified London Agreement (LA), which aims to reduce the translation requirements for patent validation procedures in 15 out of 34 national patent offices. The simulations suggest that the cost of patenting has been reduced by 20 to 30 percent since the enforcement of the LA. With an average translation cost saving of €3,600 per patent, the total savings for the business sector amount to about €220 millions. The fee elast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Bottom panel) The figures for China and India were capped at 1.5, but amount to 3.37 and 5.07, respectively. Sources : Fees were collected on patent office websites, except for fees at the EPO which come from van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie and Mejer (). Note that fees at the EPO are computed for the six most frequently targeted countries (DE, GB, FR, NL, IT, and CH).…”
Section: Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Bottom panel) The figures for China and India were capped at 1.5, but amount to 3.37 and 5.07, respectively. Sources : Fees were collected on patent office websites, except for fees at the EPO which come from van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie and Mejer (). Note that fees at the EPO are computed for the six most frequently targeted countries (DE, GB, FR, NL, IT, and CH).…”
Section: Stylized Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, translation requirements make the European market expensive to protect, especially when compared with the United States or Japan. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie and Mejer () report that translation costs account for half the total cost of patenting for a patent that is to be validated in six EPC member states . They also estimate that the recently ratified London Agreement, which aims to reduce the translation requirement for patent validation procedures in 14 out of 34 national patent offices, has reduced the cost of patenting by 20%–30%.…”
Section: Impact Of Fees On Applicants’ Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to other large regional or national patent offices in the world, payment of national validation and renewal fees, and the translation requirements must be multiplied by the number of countries where the applicant wants to have an effective protection. Despite the implementation of the London Agreement that aims at reducing translation requirements 3 a European patent is still at least five times more expensive than in the United States (van Pottelsberghe and Mejer 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%