The Logic of Urban Fragmentation: Organisational Ecology and the Proliferation of American Cities

Abstract

Much research has been done on the causes of metropolitan consolidation and its rarity. However, the causes of metropolitan fragmentation are rarely considered. Without considering the reasons for fragmentation, it is difficult to make wise decisions, especially when state policies granting power to local governments cause fragmentation. This article proposes that city formation follows a niche model, much like the formation of interest groups, and that the factors governing interest group origination also affect city formation. To form, cities need residents, resources and entrepreneurs to come together such that a new city can be affordably created. It tests this theory against data from the US Census of Governments and other sources, and finds that Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA’s) fragment differently from non-MSA counties, state grants of local power increase fragmentation, and more resources allow for more fragmentation. It concludes with a discussion of the results and how they should influence urban policy.

Recentralization as an Alternative to Urban Dispersion: Transformative Planning in a Neoliberal Societal Context

“…While regional transportation planning agencies and the direct involvement of higher levels of government assure metropolitan‐level coordination of transportation planning (albeit rather less so for public transit than for highways), things are different for land‐use planning (Goetz et al ., ). Land‐use planning is typically subject to municipal jurisdiction, which renders the coordination of strategies difficult in most metropolitan regions due to administrative fragmentation (Phares, ; Howell, ). With direct implications for transformative urban strategies is the sensitivity of municipal administrations to ‘nimby' residents wary of density and mixed use.…”