2009
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Logic of Collective Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
2,149
5
177

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,891 publications
(2,379 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
48
2,149
5
177
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note here, that depending on the design of the management-byobjectives or teaching awards being used, they usually do not qualify as selective incentives because they fail to discriminate between those who contribute to the organization's (collective principal) interest and those who do not (Olson 1968). Besides, awards suit in many respects the scientific community (Frey and Neckermann 2008): they match well with ideological restrictions and are advantageous in comparison to other monitoring and control mechanisms with regard to feasibility.…”
Section: Teaching Awardsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to note here, that depending on the design of the management-byobjectives or teaching awards being used, they usually do not qualify as selective incentives because they fail to discriminate between those who contribute to the organization's (collective principal) interest and those who do not (Olson 1968). Besides, awards suit in many respects the scientific community (Frey and Neckermann 2008): they match well with ideological restrictions and are advantageous in comparison to other monitoring and control mechanisms with regard to feasibility.…”
Section: Teaching Awardsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on these arguments, Olson [17] comes to the conclusion that every group or organization is seeking to ensure some kind of collective good. The acquisition of this collective good is beneficial for all members of the group.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is about six hectares smaller than the average P3A group size reported in Table 1. I expect that these variables would be negatively related to WUA activity, as smaller groups should mobilize more easily (Olson, 1965).…”
Section: Wua Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, group size and clearly defined boundaries also shape the ability of groups to be successful (Fujiie et al, 2005;Olson, 1965;Tang, 1992). In general, though, these characteristics are held constant among the three districts.…”
Section: (B) Alternative Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 97%