1957
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1972.tb00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Log Likelihood Ratio Test (The G‐test)

Abstract: SUMMAEY The theoretical basis of the log likelihood ratio test (the G‐test) is described, and instructions and tables are given for its use as a test of heterogeneity in contingency tables. There is a marked saving in computation time over the customary Karl Pearson test. It is a pleasure to thank Miss Mary Wheeler and Miss Madge Wight for the major part of the computations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two omnibus model comparisons of algorithm performance at transfer were calculated for each model, relative to subject accuracy: the Schwarz-Bayes Information Criterion ("SBIC" Kass and Wasserman, 1995) and the log-likelihood ratio ("G" Woolf, 1957). Betasort received the lowest (i.e.…”
Section: /23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two omnibus model comparisons of algorithm performance at transfer were calculated for each model, relative to subject accuracy: the Schwarz-Bayes Information Criterion ("SBIC" Kass and Wasserman, 1995) and the log-likelihood ratio ("G" Woolf, 1957). Betasort received the lowest (i.e.…”
Section: /23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate if there are differences in bat captures inside and outside PAs, we performed a G test (Woolf, 1957) for each species for testing the null hypothesis that these species are evenly distributed between conserved and degraded sites. Similarly, we also performed the same analysis grouping all captured bats from the frugivore and nectarivore guilds (based on Simmon and Voss's [1998] study).…”
Section: Data Analysis Diversity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…square of cellophane, a^-in.-square coverslip and filter paper. The tissue was squashed in a press delivering about 40 kg/cm2 (Beatty, 1957b Woolf (1957) and analysis of variance as outlined by Snedecor (1956 fig. 1.…”
Section: Cytological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%